Current Issue

Jan.28, 2009

Vol. 109, No. 7

Foreign-policy choices

In response to: Never Again?

Because I’ve been a Libertarian since the summer before junior year of high school and thus favored a largely non-interventionist foreign policy since about that time (and even more fervently since the end of the U.S.S.R.), I didn’t know that it was possible to become even less sympathetic to recent neoconservative gambits in the Islamic world until I read the article on Professor Gary Bass’ theories (feature, Nov. 5). However, that all three of his examples of previous antigenocidal actions were vis--vis the Ottoman Empire should automatically make one suspicious, since it is now an ex-empire that other empires had incentives to consume — and did.

He claims that, if anything, the United Kingdom’s actions for Greece were against its own interests vis--vis the Russians. Yet most decolonized Ottoman turf after World War I went to the British and French, not the Russians. I guess the final straw for me was the intervention by the French for the Maronites a century and a half ago. We have the same attempts in 2005 to kick out the Syrians after Hariri’s assassination and prop up a Cedar Revolu-tion, but with the result that the Israelis — a year later — went back to slaughtering hundreds of innocent civilians after local Islamic groups went back to their tricks.

Democracy in Iraq gave us Shia control and a loss of rights for women and minorities. In Iran it gave us Ahmadinejad; in Palestine, Hamas instead of the “moderate” PLO. In computer consulting, if you mess up too many times (sometimes just once), you get fired. I suppose if you’re a neocon and mess up, you get promoted to secretary of state (sigh).

Normal, Ill.

Post Comments
Tell us what you think about
Foreign-policy choices
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
CURRENT ISSUE: Jan.28, 2009

Inbox Search:


* Online archives date back to Sept. 1995. The date filters only work for content posted after December 2007.

Browsing Letters 2008-2009

Inbox (Archives)

PAW welcomes letters on its contents and topics related to Princeton University. We may edit them for length, accuracy, clarity, and civility; brevity is encouraged. As a general guideline, letters should not exceed 250 words. Due to the volume of correspondence, we are unable to publish all letters received. Letters, articles, photos, and comments submitted to PAW may be published in print, electronic, or other forms. Write to PAW, 194 Nassau St., Suite 38, Princeton, NJ 08542; send email to; or call 609-258-4885.