Current Issue

Oct.7, 2009

Vol. 110, No. 2

It is ironic that if Justice Samuel Alito ’72’s Concerned Alumni of Princeton had had its way, Justice Sonia Sotomayor ’76 would not have been admitted to Princeton.

Justice Alito’s alliance with an organization that sought to block affirmative action and the admission of women to Princeton is one demonstration of the truth behind Ms. Sotomayor’s statement, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

There will be many more such demonstrations in the opinions that are likely to be written by the two Princeton justices in the years to come.

John C. Tucker ’55
Lanexa, Va.

Post Comments
Tell us what you think about
Contrasting opinions
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
CURRENT ISSUE: Oct.7, 2009

Inbox Search:


* Online archives date back to Sept. 1995. The date filters only work for content posted after December 2007.

Inbox (Archives)

PAW welcomes letters on its contents and topics related to Princeton University. We may edit them for length, accuracy, clarity, and civility; brevity is encouraged. As a general guideline, letters should not exceed 250 words. Due to the volume of correspondence, we are unable to publish all letters received. Letters, articles, photos, and comments submitted to PAW may be published in print, electronic, or other forms. Write to PAW, 194 Nassau St., Suite 38, Princeton, NJ 08542; send email to; or call 609-258-4885.