Current Issue

Apr.28, 2010

Vol. 110, No. 12

Climate sensitivity and the status quo

In response to: Temperatures rising

Climate change is not a debate; it's a value – indeed, a responsive sensitivity to the environment that can only make the world a better place, spurring energy independence as a bonus, against which any fanatical objection undermines dreaming, loving, and a universal quest for global identity. Imprisoning these visions, in turn, paralyzes the greater good of imagination (shoring our shores, if you will).

For William Happer *64 to question “Temperatures Rising” (feature, March 17), how is game theory any less presumptuous than what Al Gore had invoked back when An Inconvenient Truth hadn’t yet upgraded a charged situation into something more inspiringly sustainable?Had it not been for Gore’s brave newbitter division, Mr. Happer’s alleged “scientific breakthrough” is nothing more than an unenlightened remandfor the status quo of “settled assumptions” accepted over the millennia.

Chris Morris *78
Armonk, N.Y.

Post Comments
Tell us what you think about
Climate sensitivity and the status quo
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
CURRENT ISSUE: Apr.28, 2010

Inbox Search:


* Online archives date back to Sept. 1995. The date filters only work for content posted after December 2007.

Browsing Letters 2009-2010

Inbox (Archives)

PAW welcomes letters on its contents and topics related to Princeton University. We may edit them for length, accuracy, clarity, and civility; brevity is encouraged. As a general guideline, letters should not exceed 250 words. Due to the volume of correspondence, we are unable to publish all letters received. Letters, articles, photos, and comments submitted to PAW may be published in print, electronic, or other forms. Write to PAW, 194 Nassau St., Suite 38, Princeton, NJ 08542; send email to; or call 609-258-4885.