Current Issue

Sept.22, 2010

Vol. 111, No. 1

Bring back the ‘ironbounds’

In response to: New selection process proposed for clubs

Posted on September1, 2010

The proposed automatic matching system fordetermining eating club membership (Notebook, June 2) will likely produce an atomistic result. The club section will be a group of individualspreferring or being preferred by the club.They may have little relationship to each other. Building a cohesive club section will take more time in an already short period of student membership. The medical schools actually exercise more discretion in building their class and residency groups.

Providing the option of students applying together in contracted small groups of friendsor “ironbounds,” as they could in the early 1950s, would overcome the atomistic result but at the expense of bidding cliques.

Clubs would profit by combining groups that would amount to an efficient club section.Friendly groupsin club sections will occur anyway. Better to have them early, rather than later.

Fred Fraley ’54
Dallas, Texas

Post Comments
Tell us what you think about
Bring back the 'ironbounds'
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
Send
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
CURRENT ISSUE: Sept.22, 2010

Inbox Search:

Keyword:
Date:

to
* Online archives date back to Sept. 1995. The date filters only work for content posted after December 2007.

Browsing Letters 2010-2011

Inbox (Archives)

PAW welcomes letters on its contents and topics related to Princeton University. We may edit them for length, accuracy, clarity, and civility; brevity is encouraged. As a general guideline, letters should not exceed 250 words. Due to the volume of correspondence, we are unable to publish all letters received. Letters, articles, photos, and comments submitted to PAW may be published in print, electronic, or other forms. Write to PAW, 194 Nassau St., Suite 38, Princeton, NJ 08542; send email to paw@princeton.edu; or call 609-258-4885.