Current Issue

Feb.9, 2011

Vol. 111, No. 7

Notebook

How to stamp out evil

Stress honor, not morality, Kwame Anthony Appiah argues

By W. Barksdale Maynard ’88
Published in the February9, 2011, issue


W.W. Norton & Company

Philosophy professor Kwame Anthony Appiah is one of Princeton’s most distinguished public intellectuals. Raised in Ghana, educated in England, he jets around the globe giving lectures on how philosophical ideas apply to everyday life. The title of his previous book, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, is suggestive of his far-reaching approach.

While writing that book, he became intrigued by the ancient Chinese practice of footbinding (crushing girls’ feet into a tiny size), which proved resistant to all moral appeals against it and disappeared only when national honor suddenly seemed at stake. Could honor be different from morality? From Aristotle on down, the two have been conflated, but could honor be the more powerful instrument in changing opinion about evil behaviors? Honing his thoughts through lectures at universities in England, Germany, Austria, and the United States, Appiah has produced The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen, published by Norton in September.

He singles out three historic practices that later were stamped out: dueling, footbinding, and the Atlantic slave trade. In each case, he says, a successful public campaign to end the misconduct was based not on questions of right or wrong, but on honor. Dueling swiftly perished when attitudes changed among gentlemen, who went from considering it highly honorable, to disreputable. The excruciating binding of women’s feet disappeared with great abruptness once China began to worry about its reputation among nations, early in the 20th century — national honor seeming at stake. A similar sense of honor led Great Britain finally to ban the slave trade after all appeals to morality had proven futile.

The book concludes with the problem of honor killings in today’s Pakistan, where parents sometimes kill daughters following sexual liaisons or rape. It’s estimated that as many as 1,000 women in Pakistan and 5,000 worldwide are murdered annually, according to the U.N. Population Fund. The effective way to stamp out this horrible practice, Appiah argues, is to stress to Pakistan that it is shameful and dishonorable, not that it is morally wrong.

His most important conclusion, Appiah told PAW, is that “honor is not part of morality; it can be aligned with it, or not. I think it’s more helpful to think of it as separate, and how you can adapt it to serve moral ends.” He notes that the Princeton honor code is not entirely about morality; in part it “reinforces norms that are purely academic, like sourcing and acknowledgments. You don’t have an obligation to write footnotes in your personal letters.”

Many philosophers write abstrusely, but Appiah aims to be accessible: “I’m trying to articulate ideas that are useful for people in thinking about their lives.” Honor sounds quaint, he admits, but he seeks to revive the term and apply it to current issues, like the shame that waterboarding brings on a nation. Dueling and footbinding may be gone, but many evils persist worldwide, and he lists four that someday may be shamed out of existence: mass incarceration of prisoners in the United States, industrial production of meat, dumping the elderly in nursing homes, and rampant abuse of the environment.
Post Comments
Comments
3 Responses to How to stamp out evil

Jean E. Taylor *73 w'55 p*89 Says:

2011-02-08 13:35:33

Is the difference that I don't have to accept that my behavior is morally wrong, but only observe that others think it is so wrong that they might shun me because of it? So that one is evoking the need to belong to a wider community?

C. Lang Says:

2011-02-10 23:23:50

I wonder if it's not so much a matter of morality and honor, but human evolution. If one considers the reality that morality and honor in a sense, parallel eachother; then it's easy to take it a step further and look at evolution. Not in terms of Darwin's biology, but more along the lines of psychological ideology. Think about it....

George C. Denniston '55 MD, MPH Says:

2013-10-18 12:13:18

An unnecessary practice that limits us as humans is circumcision. If we are to grow morally and spiritually, this barbaric practice must stop. No one, and especially not a doctor, has the right to remove normal body parts from another human being without his express written informed consent. The German High Court recently called it an "assault" that could not be justified even on religious grounds.
Tell us what you think about
How to stamp out evil
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
Send
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
CURRENT ISSUE: Feb.9, 2011