Current Issue

Sept.18, 2013

Vol. 114, No. 1

From the Editor

PAW’s New Look

By Marilyn H. Marks *86
Published in the September18, 2013, issue

When a new editor arrives at a magazine, a redesign usually arrives soon after.

But PAW, like Princeton, is not known for rushing headlong into change. And so it is only now — a decade into my tenure — that PAW has been redesigned.

We consider this as part of an evolution, not a revolution, in PAW’s look and content. In the magazine world, a decade is forever; the advent of online media has changed the way people read and gather information. Surveys we conducted every few years suggested that we needed to do more to appeal to younger alumni without alienating the baby boomers and older readers who have been so loyal to the magazine. Designers at Pentagram in New York came up with an updated look that we think respects tradition at the same time.

The changes begin with our cover. The back-to-basics nameplate recalls one that was used in the past and states proudly who we are: We’re Princeton, and we’re alumni. (True, our print issue no longer comes out weekly — while our website, Facebook, and Twitter feeds are updated far more often than every seven days — but the name is our brand.) Pentagram provided a wide range of options for our cover; alumni at informal focus groups overwhelmingly preferred this look.

Inside, we took survey results to heart and expanded coverage of Princeton research by creating a new section called Life of the Mind and a back-page history feature called That Was Then. Campus news and sports run in the On the Campus section, which always will begin with a full-page campus scene — the same kind of beautiful image that ran at the back of the magazine in the recent past. Alumni news comes together in a section called Princetonians. We aimed to make the layout of Class Notes (page 52) cleaner, with a typeface that is easier to read. (The length of class columns has not changed.)

We previewed our work with alumni in Princeton and Washington, D.C., as well as with the various Princeton committees that consult with PAW. The alumni offered suggestions — some wrote reactions on sticky notes — and we considered each one. In response, we changed fonts, improved legibility, altered section names, and reinstated some of the particulars that make PAW, well, PAW. We are grateful to Luke Hayman and Regan Johnson at Pentagram for providing a wonderful design and accommodating our peculiar requests, often relating to the color orange. PAW art director Marianne Nelson, who always makes the magazine look good, was a true partner, serving as a bridge between Pentagram and our word-oriented staff.

As you will see in the following pages, many of the details of PAW have changed. But at its core, PAW is the same. PAW is your magazine. We have the same mission, and we hope to carry it out better than ever. In the months ahead, let us know how well we succeed.

Ricardo Barros
Post Comments
5 Responses to From the Editor

Michelle E. Cooksley Says:

2013-09-12 10:04:39

Looking good.

Richard Trenner '70 Says:

2013-09-13 09:10:12

Even the paper stock feels nicer and presents the content better. The magazine has never looked better. Well done! And lovely Ricardo Barros photographs of the Graduate College ... Two suggestions: Include links to articles cited in "In Short" AND make the shorts a bit less short. Otherwise, only one portable little idea is likely to come across on a complex subject, as in the little pieces on Angus Deaton's paper on "elderly Americans who live with children and teens" and Janet Currie' article on "Ritalin and overall outcomes." Some things can't be squeezed into on paragraph without getting damaged. How were the studies controlled? In the case of Ritalin and ADHD, the preponderance of scientific/medical evidence supports the conclusion that medications are the first-line treatment in what is preeminently a neuro-chemical condition. In the case of the "gloomy" views of elderly Americans living with children and teens, some important socio-economic factors must, I suspect, be at play here in Deaton's gloomy findings.

Bob Peskin '78 Says:

2013-09-16 11:16:53

THANK YOU for the redesign of the print version of the magazine. It looks fantastic.

Art Brown '46 Says:

2013-10-08 10:44:08

Several years ago I protested the change of the cover from the traditional look to which you have turned. And all these years I've labored over the change to the PAW logo. Thankfully, you have returned in the new look to the distinctive, traditional design that's handsome and dignified ... and I thank you. And the website and reorganization throughout is most commendable. My hat's off for a giant step to reflect a real professional image. Now, if you could only slow down the move of our Class Notes to the beginning of the section, you would really get my thanks.

Darius M. Kwiedorowicz '82 Says:

2013-10-08 10:46:36

Everything that I disliked in the past PAW design has been removed. The cover, logo, and the silly page-number placement are all as they should be. Excellent work.
Tell us what you think about
From the Editor
Enter the word as it appears in the picture below
By submitting a comment, you agree to PAW's comment posting policy.
Web Exclusives
A cover collage, from 1900 to 2013