Yes, she was unarmed and successful for the families of the Sandy Hook victims. But how was she dangerously contributing to the gun problem? There are more guns in America than people, and they are used so frequently that there is not enough money to compensate all the family victims if one tried to do so. I have no problem with this heroine attorney, I do have a problem with some of the conclusions about this whole effort, which are false. As often the case, the evidence and facts hardly support the conclusions.
In Response to: Unarmed and Dangerous