The Right Direction

Student survey finds decline in reports of inappropriate sexual behavior

By Allie Wenner and Tammy Tseng ’18

Published Nov. 23, 2016

4 min read

Students receive information on Princeton’s UMatter campaign, which promotes bystander intervention and healthy choices, in September.

Courtesy Princeton UMatter

A new student survey has found that the number of incidents of sexual misconduct has declined since last year and that students are more aware of University resources and victim support.

The survey was the second in as many years — a step taken in response to a determination by the U.S. Department of Education that Princeton had failed to respond “promptly and equitably” to complaints of sexual violence.

Results, released Nov. 10, found that 15 percent of students last year experienced one or more forms of inappropriate sexual behavior (which includes sexual assault, stalking, abusive intimate relationships, and sexual harassment), down from 20 percent the previous year. “The numbers are still too high, but this is the direction we want them to be moving in,” said Vice Provost Michele Minter. The rate was the highest among undergraduate women (28 percent), followed by graduate women (17 percent), undergraduate men (9 percent), and graduate men (5 percent). Complete survey results can be found at bit.ly/wespeak2016.

Nine percent of all students reported experiencing sexual assault, with that number rising to 19 percent for undergraduate women. Two percent overall reported being a victim of rape, according to the survey, including 4 percent of undergraduate women.

The survey found heightened student awareness of University resources and support, and more than two-thirds said they would intervene if they saw others sexually intimidating or bothering someone in a public space on campus.

Other findings included:

  • Lesbian, gay, and bisexual students were nearly twice as likely to experience inappropriate sexual behavior and nearly three times as likely to be raped as heterosexual students.
  • Among those who experienced sexual assault, about two-thirds of undergraduate women, undergraduate men, and graduate men said the person who had assaulted them had been using alcohol or a combination of alcohol and drugs; for graduate women the figure was 56 percent.
  • Ten percent of graduate women and 1 percent of graduate men experienced sexual harassment (a slight increase from last year). Forty-eight percent of those incidents took place in an academic or work setting, and 52 percent involved a co-worker, a professor or instructor, a staff member, or a postdoc.

Administrators said more students are using University resources — like the Sexual Harassment/Assault Advising, Resources, and Education (SHARE) office — to cope with experiences of sexual misconduct. SHARE director Jackie Deitch-Stackhouse said a student peer program and an initiative called UMatter, which focuses on bystander intervention, have had positive results.

SHARE peers — who raise awareness about issues of sexual misconduct, provide bystander education, and help connect students with the SHARE office — span a wide range of groups and social circles, Deitch-Stackhouse said. In some cases, she said, their work encourages students who are considering professional help to contact the SHARE office.

Deitch-Stackhouse and Minter lauded efforts by the eating clubs to work with University staff.

“The eating clubs’ role right now in combating sexual misconduct is much greater than people are willing to see, because it’s easy to paint eating clubs in a bad way,” said Colonial Club president Christopher Yu ’17, who chairs the Interclub Council. The ICC has discussed the possibility of not allowing members who have been suspended for sexual misconduct to rejoin a club or of prohibiting people who have committed sexual misconduct from entering clubs, he said.

Other organizations on campus are also working to raise awareness about interpersonal violence. One group, SpeakOut, meets weekly to discuss sexual-misconduct cases in the news and related issues on campus.

Students across different years and genders offered mixed views, but many said the University does a good job overall of promoting awareness of what sexual misconduct is and what resources are available for students.

“In my four years here, I’ve noticed a trend toward being OK with talking about [sexual misconduct],” said Luke Pfleger ’17. “The WeSpeak surveys are sobering in the sense that you realize how many people are affected by this issue, but good in that they help people come together and realize that there is an issue.”

Patrick Boroughs ’18 recently completed a mandatory sexual-misconduct online-training session that the University requires all juniors to take. “It was good to get a reminder, especially because a lot of that training happens during freshman year,” he said.

Emely DeJesus ’17 said that while she has received many emails about initiatives like WeSpeak and UMatter, she has seen less information about issues beyond general awareness and knowledge of sexual misconduct. “Unless you’ve actually had a situation where you need to be directly involved [in reporting sexual misconduct], you don’t know how the system works or how Princeton feels about things,” she said.

Colleen O’Gorman ’17, the president of SHARE for about two years, said more students are talking about interpersonal violence and sexual misconduct. “It’s definitely a harder issue to ignore,” she said.

Minter pointed out that for the second year in a row, survey data found that sophomores have the greatest odds of experiencing sexual misconduct. She said the University is considering how to provide more support for sophomores.

Ten individuals were found by a University investigative panel to be responsible for at least one sexual misconduct violation during the 2015–16 academic year. Two students were expelled after being found responsible for rape; employees found responsible in four sexual-misconduct cases no longer work at Princeton; and one alumnus was banned from campus for sexual assault. 

2 Responses

Winton J. Tolles ’73

7 Years Ago

Sexual-Misconduct Report

It was with a mixture of sadness and anger I read the article on inappropriate sexual behavior (On the Campus, Dec. 7). Some observations, with my apologies to the LGBT and male communities:

“Experiencing sexual assault ... 19 percent for undergraduate women”: Instead, let’s say one in five, or 500 undergraduate women. Put 25 women in a group, and note five have been sexually assaulted.

Four percent of undergraduate women were raped: 100 women were raped! Just two students were expelled for rape.

The numbers for graduate students are equally shocking.

Can you imagine Princeton’s response if 1,000 students were held up at gunpoint, had their cars stolen or even their rooms burglarized?

Meanwhile, the Interclub Council is discussing the “possibility” of prohibiting students who have been suspended for sexual misconduct from rejoining the club or keeping those who committed sexual misconduct from entering a club. Let’s keep discussing ...

The vice provost is happy to report “the numbers are still too high, but this is the direction we want them to be moving in.” The numbers are horrific. The right direction is zero. What happened to the other 98 rapists? Forgive me for assuming there are no serial rapists. Were the police informed of these criminal acts? Were perpetrators prosecuted and jailed?

At a time when our new U.S. president has bragged about his many sexual assaults, I find Princeton’s response to all forms of sexual misconduct grossly inadequate and shameful. This story belongs on PAW’s cover and needs to be on the President’s Page. What a disgrace.


Editor’s note: Michele Minter, vice provost for institutional equity and diversity, provided the following response: “The University takes sexual misconduct very seriously and agrees that any incidents are too many. As President Christopher Eisgruber wrote on his President’s Page in PAW in November 2015, ‘The only acceptable number of rapes on a college campus is zero.’ Over the past three years, Princeton has significantly increased mandatory training, optional educational programs, and support and reporting resources. Princeton encourages sexual-misconduct victims and survivors to report, but most choose not to do so. The University respects their right to decide how they wish to handle their experiences or whether they want to involve law enforcement. For more information, including reports of sexual misconduct adjudicated during the 2015–16 academic year, see http://sexualmisconduct.princeton.edu/.”

Norman Ravitch *62

7 Years Ago

The military is just as...

The military is just as guilty of sexual crime as any university. Why is this? I think the way boys are raised has something to do with it. Boys are encouraged to seek competitive sports as the outlet for their energy and talent. Respect for the sexual right of others, no matter of whatever gender, is hard to encourage in such an environment. The result is that young men and then all men essentially remain teenagers throughout life, with the teenagers' characteristic trait of sexual immaturity and search for illicit adventure. Our male population, whether in the military, in the university, in the political field, in the workplace, and in the church, continues in the teenage pattern and never ever gives it up. Our culture — music, books, television, games, etc. — simply continues this.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics