Norman Ravitch *62

6 Years Ago

Are Artworks Valued Like Stocks?

I never thought about the economics of music performances and performers because I am one of those who have never got much past Mozart. But I do have a question about the Art World.

As the risk of being a philistine, I would like to say I cannot see how artworks are evaluated in monetary terms. The notion that an artist like Picasso could doodle on a paper napkin and have it be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not even more, makes me wonder if Art is not totally evaluated like stocks: not on the basis of intrinsic value but as a way of making money in a down or up market without any concern for intrinsic value. What makes my neighbor's painting worth $300 at the local art center and something by a long-dead Fleming worth $3,000,000? I confess I cannot say, because I think value is entirely in the mind and eye of the beholder and in the pocketbook of the investor -- with no other meaning. I would love some comments about this. I am not afraid of being considered an art philistine because I have a healthy respect for my own judgment in many, not all, things. Unlike Monsieur Jourdain, I know I am writing prose and don't feel excited by the discovery!

Join the conversation

Plain text

No HTML tags allowed.

Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.