I noted with interest James W. Seymore ’65’s letter (Inbox, Feb. 6) criticizing PAW’s coverage of the football team’s notable achievements this past fall. Reasonable alumni may differ on the amount of space PAW should devote to an extracurricular activity pursued by a small minority of the student body. However, when Mr. Seymore attributes the purported paucity of coverage not, for instance, to football’s contribution to brain injury, but to “#MeToo and regnant feminism,” it simply shows the absurd lengths to which some men will go to blame absolutely everything on women.
I noted with interest James W. Seymore ’65’s letter (Inbox, Feb. 6) criticizing PAW’s coverage of the football team’s notable achievements this past fall. Reasonable alumni may differ on the amount of space PAW should devote to an extracurricular activity pursued by a small minority of the student body. However, when Mr. Seymore attributes the purported paucity of coverage not, for instance, to football’s contribution to brain injury, but to “#MeToo and regnant feminism,” it simply shows the absurd lengths to which some men will go to blame absolutely everything on women.
Nevertheless, She Roars.