Freedom of Speech as Applied to the State of Israel
In an American academic community, reasoned debate about the policies and actions of the State of Israel are entirely legitimate, but demands for the destruction of Israel and the annihilation of its population are not legitimate. The difference between the two is similar to the difference between challenging a political opponent to a debate and threatening to kill him.
In an American academic community, reasoned debate about the policies and actions of the State of Israel are entirely legitimate, but demands for the destruction of Israel and the annihilation of its population are not legitimate. The difference between the two is similar to the difference between challenging a political opponent to a debate and threatening to kill him.