“In an email to the Center for Jewish Life’s mailing list, executive director Rabbi Gil Steinlauf ’91 wrote that the committee’s decision ‘affirms what so many in our community have expressed: that the complexities of this issue defy any singular viewpoint and that Princeton should not take a stance that would divide its community on such a deeply personal and painful matter.’”
Please explain how not divesting from what I believe is a genocidal regime is less divisive than divesting? Inaction is still taking a stance. Silence is complicity.
“In an email to the Center for Jewish Life’s mailing list, executive director Rabbi Gil Steinlauf ’91 wrote that the committee’s decision ‘affirms what so many in our community have expressed: that the complexities of this issue defy any singular viewpoint and that Princeton should not take a stance that would divide its community on such a deeply personal and painful matter.’”
Please explain how not divesting from what I believe is a genocidal regime is less divisive than divesting? Inaction is still taking a stance. Silence is complicity.