This letter is to express my appreciation for David Montgomery ’83’s article on alumni interviewing in the April 2024 Princeton Alumni Weekly. A graduate alumnus, I have been an interviewer for 17 years. I love interviewing: Meeting and connecting with candidates for Princeton has always been a treat for me. I only wish that I was able to interview more than the seven or eight whom I am able to interview every year.
To be sure, only a few highly qualified students I interview can be accepted for admission, but I think the interviews have intrinsic value. (My own experiences are such that I think the Admission Office does a super job with selecting quality candidates for admission.) Maybe the candidate interviewed should — but doesn’t — get an offer of admission as an undergraduate, but if the interview is positive, they may return later to Princeton for potential admission to the graduate school, or as a postdoc, or maybe even as a future teacher or professor.
As an ambassador for Princeton, I strive to keep my interviews informative, helpful, and positive. Moreover, as Bradley Saft ’00 stated in the article, I also try to “add some color to the application that the admission office may not have.” I think interviews have value, for Princeton, for the candidate — accepted or not — and for me as an interviewer. I hope the in-person interviews continue. I also hope I can do this for another 17 years. As one of the thousands of us who interview every year, a big thank you again for this article. Go Tigers!
This letter is to express my appreciation for David Montgomery ’83’s article on alumni interviewing in the April 2024 Princeton Alumni Weekly. A graduate alumnus, I have been an interviewer for 17 years. I love interviewing: Meeting and connecting with candidates for Princeton has always been a treat for me. I only wish that I was able to interview more than the seven or eight whom I am able to interview every year.
To be sure, only a few highly qualified students I interview can be accepted for admission, but I think the interviews have intrinsic value. (My own experiences are such that I think the Admission Office does a super job with selecting quality candidates for admission.) Maybe the candidate interviewed should — but doesn’t — get an offer of admission as an undergraduate, but if the interview is positive, they may return later to Princeton for potential admission to the graduate school, or as a postdoc, or maybe even as a future teacher or professor.
As an ambassador for Princeton, I strive to keep my interviews informative, helpful, and positive. Moreover, as Bradley Saft ’00 stated in the article, I also try to “add some color to the application that the admission office may not have.” I think interviews have value, for Princeton, for the candidate — accepted or not — and for me as an interviewer. I hope the in-person interviews continue. I also hope I can do this for another 17 years. As one of the thousands of us who interview every year, a big thank you again for this article. Go Tigers!