As a new reader of PAW, I very much enjoyed the coverage of election related news. However, I was surprised to see the difference in the description of Ted Cruz ’92 and other alums (“Election Day,” October issue).
I’m no fan of Cruz and agree that a mention of his controversies is appropriate. However, spending the entire blurb talking about them and failing to mention that he is running for Senate (every other candidate had their race named) nor anything about his connection with Princeton (as most of the other candidates have) seems a bit unfair to him. I hope PAW’s coverage can be more balanced going forward.
As a new reader of PAW, I very much enjoyed the coverage of election related news. However, I was surprised to see the difference in the description of Ted Cruz ’92 and other alums (“Election Day,” October issue).
I’m no fan of Cruz and agree that a mention of his controversies is appropriate. However, spending the entire blurb talking about them and failing to mention that he is running for Senate (every other candidate had their race named) nor anything about his connection with Princeton (as most of the other candidates have) seems a bit unfair to him. I hope PAW’s coverage can be more balanced going forward.