Many were puzzled by the logic President Eisgruber used to absolve the University of her affirmative action sins while defending the unintentional hiring of mainly non-conservative faculty. Eisgruber explained that "... [to] put together a class that draws talent from every sector of society ... [we use] a holistic admissions process that takes race into account as one factor." But hiring faculty? No, we acquire "... the most talented people in the field ... [without] putting inappropriate constraints on the hiring process." Counting heads or political affiliations is a mistake, he reaffirmed.
May we vehemently disagree? Political affiliation is a pertinent sector of University society. Princeton in the Nation's Service rings hollow when you affiliate with only half of our great nation.
Once upon a time, there were Whigs and Tories ... or do we only get to feel the Bern?
Many were puzzled by the logic President Eisgruber used to absolve the University of her affirmative action sins while defending the unintentional hiring of mainly non-conservative faculty. Eisgruber explained that "... [to] put together a class that draws talent from every sector of society ... [we use] a holistic admissions process that takes race into account as one factor." But hiring faculty? No, we acquire "... the most talented people in the field ... [without] putting inappropriate constraints on the hiring process." Counting heads or political affiliations is a mistake, he reaffirmed.
May we vehemently disagree? Political affiliation is a pertinent sector of University society. Princeton in the Nation's Service rings hollow when you affiliate with only half of our great nation.
Once upon a time, there were Whigs and Tories ... or do we only get to feel the Bern?