Damian Long ’98, in a letter to PAW (Inbox, May 13), expresses dismay that the “good judgment and integrity of 18 Princeton professors” who endorsed Trump’s impeachment was challenged by a March 18 Inbox letter from a most insightful member of the Class of ’56. Bravo Class of '56! Perhaps Mr. Long will now rethink, after reading the recently released, unredacted sworn testimony of Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee.)
Rather than quote Hamilton’s The Federalist Papers or speculate that Trump’s tweets coerced Republican Senators to vote Nay, perhaps he can opine what influence was exerted for House Committee members in attendance for this testimony to vote Yea in contraindication of sworn testimony.
Damian Long ’98, in a letter to PAW (Inbox, May 13), expresses dismay that the “good judgment and integrity of 18 Princeton professors” who endorsed Trump’s impeachment was challenged by a March 18 Inbox letter from a most insightful member of the Class of ’56. Bravo Class of '56! Perhaps Mr. Long will now rethink, after reading the recently released, unredacted sworn testimony of Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee.)
Rather than quote Hamilton’s The Federalist Papers or speculate that Trump’s tweets coerced Republican Senators to vote Nay, perhaps he can opine what influence was exerted for House Committee members in attendance for this testimony to vote Yea in contraindication of sworn testimony.