While PAW may have good proofreading, I would submit that the statement, “Women lagged behind men in their assessment of their leadership skills” (Campus Notebook, Feb. 8), was an erroneous interpretation of data showing 58 percent of men vs. 45 percent of women thinking they are in the top of their class with regard to leadership. How about: “Women were more realistic than men in assessing their leadership skills”?
While PAW may have good proofreading, I would submit that the statement, “Women lagged behind men in their assessment of their leadership skills” (Campus Notebook, Feb. 8), was an erroneous interpretation of data showing 58 percent of men vs. 45 percent of women thinking they are in the top of their class with regard to leadership. How about: “Women were more realistic than men in assessing their leadership skills”?