Faculty Book: Stephen Kotkin

Tracking Stalin’s Rise to Murderous Tyrant

Placeholder author icon
By Merrell Noden ’78

Published Jan. 21, 2016

3 min read

For the last 11 years, history professor Stephen Kotkin has pored over thousands of once secret documents to understand how a poor cobbler’s son named Ioseb Jugashvili transformed himself into Joseph Stalin, whom Kotkin calls “one of the great murderous tyrants in world history.” Everything about the man who ruled the Soviet Union was outsized, from the huge swath of the world he presided over to the three decades of his rule. Tracking his unlikely rise is a Herculean task: Stalin: Volume 1: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928, which covers Stalin’s life from his birth to the launch of his disastrous policy of collectivization, runs more than 700 pages and is the first of a planned three-volume biography. Kotkin spoke to PAW about Stalin’s rise to power and what his research taught him about the nature of evil.

What drew you to Stalin?

Is there a bigger subject in history than Stalin? He was responsible for culture, the economy, politics, foreign policy. Imagine Washington, New York, and Los Angeles — the federal government, the financial markets, and Hollywood — all under the control of a single person. The time period he lived in [spanned] World War I and World War II, and saw a dramatic, total transformation of one-sixth of the Earth, with global repercussions. 

How did Stalin rise to power?

It was unimaginable that someone like Stalin — the son of a washerwoman and a cobbler — became the ruler of Russia. For Stalin to get anywhere near power, the whole world order had to be destroyed — and it was, in World War I. 

How he eventually became Stalin has to do with his acquisition of deep Marxist convictions when he was young and in the seminary in Tiflis, and then his meeting and relationship with Lenin. Of course, there was luck as well. Lenin appointed Stalin general secretary of the Communist party in April 1922; the next month, Lenin had an incapacitating stroke. But Stalin also showed uncommon skill in creating his personal dictatorship. Dictatorships do not arise automatically; they have to be built, and it is not easy.

“Stalin presided during the Soviet Union’s transformation from poor peasant land to nuclear-armed superpower.” — History professor Stephen Kotkin

“Stalin presided during the Soviet Union’s transformation from poor peasant land to nuclear-armed superpower.” — History professor Stephen Kotkin

Larry Levanti

When we think of 20th-century villains, Hitler usually tops our list. Are we more forgiving of Stalin because he was our ally in World War II? 

Stalin had more than 1 million people put to death for crimes they did not commit. More than 10 million more died in famines. Several million more died in frozen wastes, where they had been deported to dig for gold with their bare hands. At the same time, history is never going to be able to wipe out the fact that Stalin was in power during the victory over Hitler in the largest-scale war ever. Stalin presided during the Soviet Union’s transformation from poor peasant land to nuclear-armed superpower. And so even though the scope of his murder and terror was so vast, Stalin’s rule will never be seen as irredeemable like Hitler’s.

You examined materials from formerly secret archives. What did you find?

An immense amount of declassified archival documents has been published in the past 15 years and is sitting in multivolume collections in Firestone. They show that the Communists, including Stalin, spoke the same way behind closed doors as they did in public. Communist ideas were pernicious; I do not share them. They caused unbelievable grief. But Stalin held those convictions deeply, and he followed them. The shock is how he was able to realize those ideas. It’s one thing to believe you must eradicate capitalism. It’s another thing to actually try that and moreover to succeed, unfortunately.

What was the biggest thing you learned doing this research? 

Evil in some ways becomes more horrifying when the evil person is humanized. He made absolutely ruthless, cold-blooded decisions alongside a sincere commitment to social justice. He was a man who was both utterly charming and utterly vicious, a shrewd Machiavellian who was also often blinkered — misdiagnosing fascism, for example. I discovered a Stalin I did not know, despite teaching the subject for 26 years.  Interview conducted and condensed by Merrell Noden ’78

2 Responses

Stephen Kotkin

8 Years Ago

The April 1 letter by Carl Middleton ’60 mischaracterized what I said. My statement that “Stalin’s rule will never be seen as irredeemable like Hitler’s” (Life of the Mind, March 4) was obviously not a statement of my own judgment on Stalin’s rule. I do not “exonerate” the Soviet despot. I am no less aware than Mr. Middleton of Stalin’s crimes, having studied his personal archive as well as Soviet police and labor camp archives exhaustively.

How does Mr. Middleton explain Stalin’s continuing popularity? It is a fact that Stalin’s rule, unlike Hitler’s, is treated as redeemable by very many people. Citing death statistics will not make this go away. Citing comparative economic-growth rates will not make this go away. Even if we as historians give Stalin no credit for the victory in World War II, he was in power when it happened. Even if we give Stalin no credit for the rise of the USSR to a nuclear-armed superpower, it happened on his watch. What would Hitler’s standing be today had he presided over a great victory in World War II?

Carl H. Middleton ’60

8 Years Ago

I am surprised Professor Stephen Kotkin has concluded that “Stalin’s rule will never be seen as irredeemable like Hitler’s” (Life of the Mind, March 4). He compares Stalin’s killing 10 million in a famine, 1 million innocents for crimes, and several million more in the Gulag to Hitler’s Holocaust that killed 11 million. He exonerates Stalin for bearing the heaviest burden in fighting the Nazis and for transforming the Soviet Union “from poor peasant land to nuclear-armed superpower.”

Estimates of those Stalin killed by famine, the Gulag, etc. range from 20 million in The Black Book of Communism up to 61,911,000 in R.J. Rummel’s Lethal Politics. Stalin also prodded North Korea to invade South Korea, leading to the deaths of 2 million Koreans, 33,667 Americans, and unknown numbers of Chinese.

Worse, Stalin made Hitler chancellor of Germany by ordering the German Communist Party not to join an election united front against the Nazis. Stalin figured Hitler would invade France, starting a general European war that would allow Stalin to invade Germany when it was exhausted. Soviet armies were easily destroyed because they were arrayed in offensive columns, not behind defensive lines.

Russia enjoyed an average rate of 5 percent economic growth under the czars from 1885 to 1914. Under Stalin, the highest growth rate was only 3.5 percent in the 1930s when it stamped out weapons.

Parenthetically, Germany’s work-to-death Holocaust camps copied the designs of the 800 Gulag work-to-death camps built by Stalin.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News