He Championed Treks to Deep Earth and Inner Space

Princeton Portrait: Harry H. Hess *32 (1906–1969)

Placeholder author icon
By Harrison Blackman ’17

Published Dec. 21, 2021

2 min read

Illustration: Daniel Hertzberg

“We spend treasures daily on fantastical sky rockets aimed feebly toward space,” wrote John Steinbeck in a 1961 issue of LIFE magazine. “Meanwhile we know practically nothing of far the greater part of our home planet covered by the sea.”

The famous author was embedded on an unconventional offshore drilling vessel, the CUSS I, part of an extraordinary attempt to drill through Earth’s crust. One of the principal minds behind the endeavor — dubbed “Project Mohole” — was Princeton geology professor Harry Hess *32, a chain-smoking, swaggering personality known for thinking outside the box. 

During World War II Hess commanded a Navy ship, the USS Cape Johnson, that used sonar to search for Japanese submarines — readings that he used to map the ocean floor. This process inspired his later research on seafloor spreading that became foundational to plate-tectonics theory. While American aerospace engineers were looking to the stars in competition with Soviet scientists, Hess and other leading oceanographers were contemplating a race to “inner space.”

At a 1957 meeting of the American Miscellaneous Society, an eccentric committee of leading earth scientists who evaluated research proposals over “wine breakfasts,” Hess and oceanographer Walter Munk proposed to drill through the Mohorovičić Discontinuity, the theoretical boundary between Earth’s crust and the mantle beneath, to acquire core samples of the mantle for study. 

With Soviet scientists also pursuing a deep drilling project, the National Science Foundation provided a $15,000 grant to begin Project Mohole. The Americans believed they had discovered a shortcut: Though the “Moho” lies 22 miles below the continental landmasses, underneath the ocean, the crust in some places is only 4 miles thick. Still, those 4 miles of rock lay 2.8 miles below the ocean surface. That made the project extremely challenging — perhaps more difficult than landing a man on the moon. 

While American aerospace engineers were looking to the stars in competition with Soviet scientists, Hess and other leading oceanographers were contemplating a race to “inner space.”

After CUSS I was launched to drill a few hundred meters beneath the oceanic crust, a leading engineering firm, Brown & Root, was hired to pursue the next phase, and budget estimates surged to about $57 million. Discouraged by the rapidly escalating costs, Congress defunded the project in 1966.

While the Mohole was never completed, its attempt led to a series of related NSF ocean-drilling programs that have expanded geological knowledge of Earth’s history. And while the U.S. abandoned the quest, the Soviets kept digging. Their Kola Superdeep Borehole, near Norway, eventually extended 7.6 miles below the surface, the deepest man-made hole dug on Earth. Drilling ceased in 1992 because at that depth, the drill bits were melting under the hellish temperatures.

In a 1966 letter to a colleague, Hess wrote, “The demise of the Mohole Project leaves me unhappy but not so discouraged that I am unwilling to start over again. It is too important a scientific project to be relegated to the next decade.” 

Though he was the champion of the race to inner space, Hess was also involved in the race to the moon. In future lunar missions, he hoped scientists would investigate questions such as whether the moon had once been volcanic and “washed by seas.” He died in 1969, on the day he chaired a National Academy of Sciences meeting celebrating the success of the first moon landing. 

2 Responses

John C. Philippides ’54

2 Years Ago

Hess’ Naval Honors

It was a sunny day in the spring of our senior year, if I recall, when, while crossing the campus, I ran into a gathering of sundry men outdoors, dressed in navy blue and white visored hats, all heavy with gold braid glistening in the sun. The entire NROTC Corps of the college was milling about, some ceremonial sidearms and ensigns adding flash and color. I spotted my classmate Homer Smith among the latter and asked him if it was a funeral of some worthy from among us. No, he said: the Navy was honoring Professor Hess — they had just promoted him to rear admiral!

That was also the last day I saw Homer, then our class president, in Navy uniform. We met later on, in a remote U.S. Army outpost, both dressed now in olive drab. He sought me out then to share report and to mourn with me our classmate, my particularly close friend as he knew, Steve Champion, lost to a car accident.

Sic transit gloria mundi.

Stephen A. Norton ’62

2 Years Ago

Learning From Hess *32

Professor Harry H. Hess *32 (Princeton Portrait, January issue) was an amazing fellow, full of stories, and patiently helped me on my senior thesis. He was one of the all-star faculty team-teaching a senior course on big topics. Hess’ topic was “continental drift,” trying to explain geologic observations from the last 100 years. The hypotheses were bizarre, but all tried to explain Earth’s offering up new landscape (ocean floor spreading) without expanding the globe. He summed it up simply: We needed a mechanism for generating new oceanic crust at ocean ridges while concurrently destroying old oceanic crust, plus acquired sediment, in ocean trenches. He sketched it out with chalk. 

One important piece of evidence was abundant guyots (named by Hess for geologist Arnold Guyot, the namesake for Guyot Hall). Guyots are flat-topped (eroded at sea level) volcanic seamounts ranging from near sea level to now more than 5,000 feet below sea level; some are found near trenches. Hess discovered them while plying the Pacific during World War II. The guyots led him to postulate that they would be consumed as the trench consumed the descending oceanic crust, including guyots, thereby conserving the volume of Earth. He was correct. 

In 1963, a three-page article by Frederick Vine and Drummond Matthews in Nature revealed the mechanism, a unifying paradigm of the evolution of the crust. Plate tectonics was born. Hess saw it all and shared it with our class in 1962. He lived to see the new paradigm fleshed out, but not nearly long enough.

Editor’s note: The writer is a professor of earth and climate sciences, emeritus, at the University of Maine.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics