In 1896, four years after the Osborn Clubhouse was built as an athletic training facility at the corner of Olden Street and Prospect Avenue, The New York Times described the building’s trophy room as “the proudest place of the entire college in the hearts of Princeton students,” adorned with portraits of sports heroes and championship banners.
But the playing fields that once stretched northeast from the back of the clubhouse have long since given way to the Engineering Quad and, later, Bowen Hall. The structure took on new life as the Third World Center in 1971 (later renamed the Carl Fields Center) until that center was relocated to the former Elm Club in September, leaving the former clubhouse empty.
While Princeton had envisioned a third act for the building at 86 Olden St. — as part of a new laboratory for the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment — the University is now prepared to demolish it. Concept plans for the project were approved by the University trustees in March.
“Our initial assumption was that we would be able to reuse 86 Olden,” said University Architect Ron McCoy *80. But because of the “tightness of the site” and the requirements for the new lab, he said, the clubhouse “just didn’t fit in.”
The University looked at the option of moving the clubhouse to another location, he said, but because vacant campus sites are at a premium, “we would just be postponing the inevitable — it would just be put in the way of a building we would want in the future.”
McCoy said the University plans to retain the ivy-covered brick wall at the corner of Olden and Prospect and the 1911 Ferris Thompson Gateway, with its marble tigers poised atop pillars in front of Bowen Hall. The gateway, like the FitzRandolph Gate in front of Nassau Hall, was designed by the firm of McKim, Mead and White.
McCoy said he received letters taking issue with the plan to raze the clubhouse from architect Robert Venturi ’47 *50; Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk ’72, dean of the University of Miami’s architecture school and a former University trustee who headed the Grounds and Buildings Committee; W. Barksdale Maynard ’88, an architectural historian and former University lecturer; and a faculty member who had helped to create the Fields Center.
Tearing down the clubhouse “is not the beginning of a trend,” said McCoy, noting that the University has been a leader in reusing older buildings. But when a new building is needed, he said, “there must be a balance between preservation and progress.”
The architect said he is aware of the clubhouse’s connections to the civil rights era (the Third World Center was a gathering place for minority students when Princeton’s diversity efforts were taking hold) and to Princeton sports, but he said it “isn’t an iconic building the way Chancellor Green or East Pyne would be.”
McCoy said Princeton also weighed the importance of the mission of the Andlinger Center: “We’re about to launch the Center for Energy and the Environment, at a time when these are the most pressing problems on earth.”
Pablo Debenedetti, vice dean of the school of engineering and applied science, said funding for the 120,000-square-foot laboratory building has been secured and groundbreaking is planned for March 2012. Construction is expected to take three years.
While the University declined to release images of the building’s design before submitting the proposal to local planning officials, McCoy said a distinctive feature will be a series of gardens on different levels, including a “green” roof.
3 Responses
Richard C. Kreutzberg ’59
8 Years AgoReminder of the past
Too bad the old Osborn field house is being torn down (Notebook, April 28). In my day it was used to serve training meals to athletic teams before contests. I think they served steak and the trimmings, and then whole wheat toast and honey for dessert. You could have as many of those slices of toast as you wanted, and I took advantage of it. I remember these meals being served in a beautiful room with a fine old fireplace, a mantel shelf, and some decorative tiles along the wall. I hope they at least preserve that fireplace and use it again in some new building. It is probably well over 100 years old and a beautiful reminder of things past.
Drew Carneal ’60
8 Years AgoA shortsighted decision
Most institutions would fight to preserve this handsome building so redolent with the traditions of the place. To me, and I think to a lot of people, it is “iconic” both for its architecture and its meaning to generations of Princetonians. This is an “of the moment” and shortsighted decision, and one that will be regretted very much in the near future.
Even though “vacant campus sites are at a premium,” maybe one should be used for a center addressing “the most pressing problems on Earth” instead of cannibalizing another historic campus building.
Robin Stennet ’01
8 Years AgoClubhouse is 'iconic'
I was saddened to read of the impending demolition of Osborn Clubhouse (recently the Third World Center) with little more than a passing nod to its role in Princeton minority life (Notebook, April 28). The article and perhaps the University seem not to consider Osborn as “iconic” as its peer buildings, Chancellor Green or East Pyne, but this assertion is a very narrow definition of what being an icon means. It is not merely appearance that establishes a building’s place in the community’s heart. Rather, its significance to groups of individuals, or to the events of its era, solidifies its stature.
I was among the last generation to find a sort of refuge at the TWC, which served a unique need for the students of color, even in 2001. It was our Ivy Club, our Frist, our Firestone. Significant events for the Princeton black, Hispanic, international, and Asian communities happened there. The Community House program launched there. The charters of minority student groups were drafted there. I wrote parts of my thesis there, attended the only formals outside of eating clubs there, and started a Black History Month event for local children there.
Last year I attended the dedication of the new Carl Fields Center and am overjoyed by that accomplishment. Additionally, it is reasonable to expect the Princeton architectural footprint to change over time. But neither of these is a reason to diminish the criticality of the TWC to thousands of students of color over recent decades by suggesting that the building itself is less important to the Princeton fabric than other campus locations.
To those who considered TWC a home away from home, the Osborn Clubhouse is indeed a Princeton
icon. If it cannot be saved, at least fair recognition of its historic contribution to Princeton is deserved.