The University Chapel is an awe-inspiring building, big and beautiful enough to make even a godless heathen wonder if it’s not time to start hedging his bets. It occupies an honored place at the center of campus, just as it did when it opened 80 years ago as the heart of Princeton’s Christian worship. As the posters hanging all around campus at the start of the fall term reminded us, Chapel was “Princeton’s First Tradition.”
Chapel still is a very important tradition at Princeton. But it is now one among many religious traditions, as this year’s Opening Exercises, which were held in the Chapel, made clear.
After the members of the freshman class had filed in and taken their seats, a procession of administrators and campus religious leaders followed, led by a student swirling a brilliantly colored Japanese kite on a long flexible pole. Three other kite bearers followed, as well as four African drummers in colorful headdresses and robes.
Above, Manav Lalwani ’09 takes part in the celebration of Diwali in November. It was the first time a Hindu festival was celebrated in the Chapel.
The ceremony itself also was determinedly multidenominational. Parts of it would have fit easily into the first service held in the building 80 years ago: a responsive reading from Psalm 104, hymns sung by the Chapel choir, organ music, and even “A Prayer for Princeton.” But it also featured texts from Judaism, Islam, and other faiths. Raj Ranade ’10 recited the Gayatri Mantra from the Vedas, from Hinduism, and Olaf Sakkers ’11 read one of the Bodhisattva Vows, from Mahayana Buddhism. Nonbelievers took part, too. For her reading, Joy Li ’11 chose a passage from The Catcher in the Rye, describing it as “from the secular humanist tradition.”
“I actually call myself an atheist,” she explains later. “But I thought ‘in the atheist tradition’ wouldn’t sound as good. And I think that being a secular humanist is much more being actively for a standard of ethics and the good treatment of other human beings. Atheism doesn’t necessarily have that implication.”
Says Paul Raushenbush, one of two associate deans in the Office of Religious Life (ORL): “Religion is happening on campus.”
And indeed, on the same late September night that the Muslim Students Association (MSA) was hosting 150 students for its annual Fast-a-Thon in hopes of teaching them about Ramadan, students from the multiple evangelical groups were in the midst of a weeklong prayer marathon. This was a feat of organization as well as devotion: Each student had signed up to pray for a 30-minute slot, and the group effort went on around the clock for one whole week. For members of the Princeton Evangelical Fellowship, or PEF, this was in addition to the 20-minute prayer meeting they hold every day at noon in Murray-Dodge. That same night, a campus group called Century One, in honor of the time when Jesus Christ walked the earth, was meeting for Bible study at Murray-Dodge. And an hour later, at 9 p.m., the Christian fellowship Athletes in Action began gathering next door, in Whig Hall, for a meeting that was decidedly more raucous than the others. Even without AiA members from the football team, which had departed for an away game, the group numbered 45 men and women. “It feels bigger than it is,” says Gordon Scharf ’09, a wrestler turned sprint football player, “because the people are bigger!”
On Friday evenings at the Center for Jewish Life, between 50 and 80 people usually convene for Sabbath services and then are joined by others for a Sabbath dinner. Rabbi Julie Roth, at Princeton for four years, introduced white tablecloths two years ago in hopes of making the dinners (prepared in the building’s kosher kitchen) a highlight of each week. Students can celebrate and learn about Judaism not only from Roth, but from a Chabad Lubavitch rabbi, Eitan Webb, and a couple, Rabbi David Wolkenfeld and his wife, Sara, who help advanced students in their studies in a beit midrash, a room with sacred texts. “Princeton is a great place to be Jewish,” Roth says emphatically. (Nonetheless, she says, one of her greatest challenges is to persuade parents of prospective students that Princeton today is not the unwelcoming place it once was for Jews.)
“Religion is less weird than when I was a student,” says Dana Dreibelbis ’78, a lay Lutheran minister, in between talking to students at the bustling activities fair in Dillon Gym in the fall. “It’s more acceptable, more of a regular topic.”
At the activities fair, tables for religious organizations stretch up and down both sides of one aisle, creating a kind of Religion Row amid the dance and musical and political groups. There’s Hallelujah!, which is made up mostly of African-Americans who meet on Sunday afternoons for a jubilant, piano-driven church service. The Crossroads Christian Fellowship gives students a chance to talk about their faith in smaller, more intimate meetings, usually in a student’s room. There’s the Manna Christian Fellowship, made up mostly of Asian-Americans; and the large Princeton Evangelical Fellowship, which organizes song-filled prayer sessions, Bible-study, retreats, and service trips, and has an offshoot called Safeguard that aims to protect students from overdoing it at weekend parties, The PEF is one of a select number of campus groups lucky enough to have its own University-recognized chaplain, Bill Boyce ’79.
There are a cappella groups with a religious slant, like Kindred Spirit, whose members come from the PEF, and Koleinu, which sings Jewish songs (the name means “our voice” in Hebrew). And the track team has its own Bible-study group, which meets on Tuesday nights. “We use the Bible as a starting point,” explains team captain Michael Maag ’09, who hosts the meetings in his room. “But we tend to view the time as more of a ‘life study’ where we try to help each other learn to live better — more spiritually, more attuned to what actually makes humans happy. It’s a focus that’s relatively scarce in the daily routine here.”
Princeton’s dean of religious life, Alison Boden, and President Tilghman are widely viewed as having done an exemplary job of supporting students in their choice of religious beliefs and practices. “We seem to have achieved that religious diversity without any intentional effort,” says politics professor Robert George, who is a conservative Catho-lic but is deeply interested in all forms of religious pursuit.
Boden radiates not just warmth, but unflappable common sense and humor, the last of which she acquired the hard way. After graduating from Vassar in 1984, she spent several years as a starving actress in New York, specializing in comic roles. She had no intention of going into religion until a stint volunteering in the pediatric AIDS ward at Harlem Hospital changed her life and led her to enroll at Union Theological Seminary. Before coming to Princeton, she spent 12 years in a similar post at the University of Chicago, where she says there was not nearly as much going on, religiously, as she has found at Princeton.
The dean believes that interest in religion has been growing for some time now, not just on college campuses but in the wider world as well. But, she says, “I wouldn’t necessarily use the word ‘religion.’ I’d say ‘spirituality.’ I talk to so many people who say, ‘I’m not religious, but I’m really spiritual.’ And that’s great.” If Boden has a single overarching goal, it is to make it possible for students to follow their spiritual convictions, wherever they might lead.
Despite all the activity on campus, Boden has only a rough idea of the religious composition of the student body. Of the religiously inclined, Christians of one denomination or another are clearly still in a majority. Jewish students are believed to make up about 10 to 12 percent of the undergraduate body, which would make it one of the smallest Jewish communities in the Ivy League. Campus religious leaders believe that between 200 and 300 students are Muslim. But because the University no longer asks about students’ religious identification, no one knows for sure.
Princeton has taken historic steps to recognize two religious groups that have been growing rapidly on campus, creating chaplaincy positions to serve Muslim and Hindu students. This year, Sohaib Sultan, the amiable author of The Koran for Dummies, became Princeton’s first full-time coordinator of Muslim life (succeeding the part-time chaplain, Khalid Latif). Princeton also recently hired Vineet Chander as the first coordinator of Hindu life, in a half-time, one-year pilot program. Chander isn’t certain, but he thinks his might be the only such position in the United States. “This is such an opportunity for the Hindu community in America,” he says.
When Manav Lalwani ’09 arrived as a freshman, he was one of three Hindu students actively pursuing the faith. Their weekly satsang — the Hindu devotional service — at Murray-Dodge had been held each Sunday morning, which is “not the best time if you wish to attract college students,” Lalwani says. But through activities like Hindu Awareness Week and the wise decision to move the satsang to Sunday night, the group now attracts 50 or 60 people for major events.
Chander is excited to be working with the group. Typically, Hindu clerics train from a very early age to be ritual priests. Chander sees himself more as a pastoral counselor. He does plan a weekly class to study the Bhagavad Gita. Among his first priorities is making sure that Dining Services understands the importance of vegetarianism. “This is not a dietary preference,” he says. “For some people, this is an absolute requirement.” He organized a festival in the Chapel to celebrate Diwali, which is also known as the Festival of Lights and celebrates the triumph of light over darkness in each of us. The celebration, held last month, marked the first time a Hindu festival had been commemorated in the Chapel.
Muslim students also have been gratified by changes that help them observe their faith. Over the summer, a footbath was installed at Murray-Dodge so students could perform their ritual washing before prayer in the building. When a time was set aside for women to use the campus climbing wall without men present, it drew a small but very appreciative group of Muslim women. Wasim Shiliwala ’09, president of the Muslim Students Association, likes the fact that following the Muslims’ jummah (prayer service) on Fridays, the Frist Campus Center makes a point of serving sandwiches with halal meat. Halal meat is available at most dining facilities.
Perhaps the most significant mark of progress has been the hiring of Sultan, who, before he came to Princeton, traveled the world trying to educate Muslims in France, Britain, and other countries about how the faith is practiced in the United States. “The hardships Muslims face in Europe are much greater than the ones American Muslims do,” he says. “When you’re marginalized in a society, the way Muslims are in Europe, it’s difficult to avoid fundamentalist values. Whereas in America, we have the luxury of speaking about Islam in a very sophisticated way.”
Sultan grew up in a suburb of Indianapolis, where his father worked as director of education for the North American Islamic Society. The Muslim community there was vibrant and proud, determined to show its best side so far from its spiritual home, though even as a boy, Sultan was aware of a “perception problem about Muslims in America. We weren’t seen as American.” When Sultan was 10, his father took a job in Mecca and the family moved to Saudi Arabia, where he was shocked to see Muslims taking their faith for granted and sometimes debasing it by lying and cheating.
Sultan returned to the United States and spent the last two years of high school in Charlottesville, where his older sister was attending the University of Virginia. One day, someone drew a picture of Saddam Hussein and left it on his desk. Another time he came to class to find his teacher furiously scrubbing away the words “sand nigger,” which someone had written on the blackboard. Sultan recounts these stories without bitterness. All of these experiences outlined a career path: He would try to serve as a bridge, linking the two cultures. “Islam is not equated with a beautiful spiritual tradition that represents one-fifth of the world’s population, but is rather associated with a politicized version of extremism,” he says. “I know from working with young Muslims that a lot of them feel wary about even expressing their identity.”
After Sept. 11, “what happened at a lot of university campuses was the phenomenon of closeted Muslims, especially at elite universities,” says politics professor Amaney Jamal, who is a practicing Muslim and the only faculty member to wear a hijab. “They felt — or were told to feel by their parents — that it wouldn’t be a smart thing to identify as Muslim.”
Celene Lizzio ’08 tested Princeton’s tolerance when, midway through her undergraduate years, she decided to veil herself. Raised in rural Pennsylvania by a Methodist mother and Catholic father, she had been a Catholic altar server. “My heroes were medieval women saints,” she says.
In the spring of her sophomore year at Princeton, Lizzio went off to study at the American University in Cairo; she remained in the city the following year, converted to Islam, and began to cover herself. “Wearing a full covering can be very pragmatic and spiritually rewarding,” she says. “It’s a mobile and semiprivate space for the cultivation of awareness and intellect, not to overlook the ease and speed with which one gets out the door in the morning!”
She makes some compromises. “You have to be sensitive to the people around you,” she says. That’s why, when she taught last year at an elementary school in Princeton, she went to the school without a veil. Nor does she wear a veil when she visits New York — “out of sensitivity that it may be severely misunderstood,” she explains. “But around Princeton, I felt that people were more open-minded and wouldn’t automatically jump to the first image they might pull off the news.”
Though observant students give the University high marks for accommodating religious belief and practice, some sense that Princeton has not been equally enthusiastic in its support for all groups — that in a generally liberal community like Princeton, it’s easy for the majority to forget that there are conservative sensibilities that deserve to be heard. Sherif Girgis ’08, now a Rhodes scholar at Oxford University, met last year with Boden to express his concern that the “liberal” side of religious and moral questions seemed to get a fuller expression at ORL-sponsored events. He cites, for example, a 2006 panel called “The Religious Right’s Obsession with Gay Sex,” which featured four panelists — none of whom spoke for the conservative side. Girgis, a Catholic, stresses that he is not for censorship — he asks only to see his side presented fairly and intelligently. Girgis says he feels satisfied that Boden took his arguments seriously.
Like some other students, Jonathan Keller ’09, the PEF president, says he felt uncomfortable when, during Orientation, he was required to sit through a presentation of “Sex on Saturday Night,” a role-playing skit designed to caution students about sexual coercion and violence. “They don’t really give a believable Christian character in this, someone who’s abstinent like a normal person,” he complains. He also wonders why, during Opening Exercises, the University has edited out of the Princeton prayer “any words that indicate we have a Christian background.” Keller is the son of two Lutheran pastors. Coming from a Christian high school in Minnesota, he did not find it easy adjusting to life at Princeton. “Living life as a Christian here can be difficult,” he says. “Seeing all the stuff that happens on [Prospect Street] — the hook-up culture, the people down the hall who had to go to McCosh with alcohol poisoning. Those types of things were very disturbing to me.”
Members of an evangelical group called Faith and Action had to fight for recognition as an official student organization a few years ago; it was originally turned down because of its affiliation to an outside organization, Christian Union, that was founded to support “sweeping spiritual transformation” at the Ivy schools and had not been approved as a campus ministry. The group won recognition in 2005, after it had turned to the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education for help. Today, it holds retreats and Bible-study groups, separating men and women in the latter.
At the same time, some Jewish students say the University dragged its feet, until last spring, in granting chaplaincy status to Eitan Webb, the Chabad rabbi. Webb arrived in Princeton in 2002, when Chabad groups were popping up on campuses around the country. For his first Sabbath dinner he had exactly five guests. By last year Chabad was routinely attracting 50 students to the house it bought near the campus with help from parents and alumni.
The University argued that the Center for Jewish Life was created precisely to unify and support all Jewish students at Princeton; by this reasoning, Chabad might splinter the Jewish community. “I think there was some concern about Chabad’s ability to function within a liberal institution,” says Arthur Ewenczyk ’09, who served as Chabad president during that time. He says the main attraction at the Chabad house is its warmth. In the end, Webb believes he got the chaplaincy because Boden and Tilghman came to Sabbath dinner on separate occasions and were impressed by what they saw. “In Hebrew they say, ‘You can’t compare audio to video,’” says Webb. “When somebody comes, and they actually see what’s going on, it changes their perspective.” Boden explains: “They meet all the criteria we ask of any religious organization we approve: that you report to a broader superstructure; that you abide by the institution’s policies; that whoever you have as your campus representative to be the affiliated chaplain has the training requisite for that tradition.”
Prayer and observance aren’t always the main attraction for those who flock to Princeton’s religious student groups. The CJL, for example, sponsors a wide range of activities — everything from the Mitzvah 5K Run to a visit by a professional Israeli folk dancer to a “Sushi in the Sukkah” event during the Jewish festival of Sukkot. And that raises a broad question about much religious practice at Princeton: Just how far should religions go in selling themselves to young seekers? At virtually all the religious gatherings on campus, games abound: Athletes in Action’s meetings are even called Game Time, and begin with a recap of the week’s sports highlights. Before prayers and a brief sermon there’s a short physical competition — a tug of war or leg wrestling or, in one misguided activity, something called the Dairy and Citrus Challenge, which involved downing large quantities of milk and orange juice and then racing. “It was a horrible idea,” concedes Scharf, the sprint football player.
But many gatherings emphasize serious conversation. Lalwani, a leader of Princeton’s Hindu community, has been a prime mover of efforts to spark discussion about religious life on campus. Last year he was behind Performing the Sacred, an evening of singing and dancing in the Chapel performed by 10 different student groups. Some were religious, some not, but they all developed a performance that embodied their idea of the sacred. This year Lalwani was planning another performance piece, the I Believe Campaign. Everyone on campus will be invited to fill in blank forms reading “I believe ...” and then place them in boxes around campus. Lalwani and a team were expecting to project some on the sides of campus buildings at night for a week or so after Thanksgiving.
Lalwani is a fellow of the Religious Life Council, which was created in 2001 to foster conversation among members of religious faiths. The council is composed of about 30 students from a variety of religions who gain membership by application. Last year (as of October, the new fellows had not been chosen) the group included a follower of the Indian religion Jainism, a Baha’i, a Sikh, seven Jews, seven Muslims, and nine Christians. “We always have someone who describes himself as a ‘seeker,’” says Raushenbush, who leads the group. “That’s an important element in the mix.”
They meet for dinner — vegetarian kosher — on Monday nights to discuss religious and moral questions, like gay marriage and abortion. “The students are so curious about each other,” says Raushenbush. Each month the group also hosts a forum called “What Matters to Me and Why” in which a prominent member of the University community — Tilghman once visited — talks on that subject. Every member of the RLC gets a grant of $1,000 to be used for a trip of spiritual significance. For example, the group’s one Baha’i member, Jon Gandomi *08, used that money to make a pilgrimage to the birthplace, in Tehran, of Baha’u’llah, the founder of Baha’i.
Similar conversations take place in other religious forums. At the MSA Fast-a-Thon in September, Sultan gives a moving talk about the moral dimensions of hunger. A few days later he hosts, along with Rabbi Roth, the second annual Muslim-Jewish iftar, the evening meal that breaks the daily fast during the month of Ramadan. (The Muslim students earlier had invited Hindu students to a similar interfaith iftar.) The 80 or so students who show up find, in the middle of each table, a sheet of paper with a series of questions for discussion. As it turns out, no such prompting is necessary. The conversation flows easily. The Muslims are nearing the end of Ramadan, while for Jews, the fast day of Yom Kippur is approaching.
The students begin by comparing the meaning and practice of fasting, among other things.
“Do you eat any particular food when you break your fast?” Parween Ebrahim wants to know. She’s a graduate student in English, from Bahrain.
“Mom makes pancakes,” says Zvi Smith ’09, with a shrug.
“I’ve got lots of questions,” Ebrahim warns. “If you get tired ... ”
But no one seems the least bit tired. A giddy energy possesses them. Must Jewish women cover their hair? Do men and women enter mosques through separate doors? And it isn’t just Muslims asking questions of Jews and the other way round. In explaining their customs to the others, students from the same religious tradition find themselves learning from each other.
“It’s very moving for me to see all of us Muslims, from such different places, sharing the same faith,” says Ebrahim.
But it is Saud Al-Thani ’11, an environmental engineer from Qatar who, in summing up the iftar, also provides a neat summary of religious life at Princeton: “Our two nations are cousins,” he says to Jewish students at the meal. “We should remember how close the two were in the past. The differences are really important too: They make us what we are. But we have a lot more in common than we usually think.”
Freelance writer Merrell Noden ’78 is a frequent PAW contributor.
11 Responses
Earl B. Byrne ’54
8 Years AgoSupporting nonbelievers
Anent “Faces of Faith” (cover story, Dec. 17): It would seem that “diversity” has been the holy grail of the University for several decades now, especially with respect to religion as it is depicted in PAW. Indeed, the online University directory of campus activities lists a multitude of religious groups, including some quite arcane. Yet a search for organizations that may represent nonbelievers draws a blank.
Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Cornell, Stanford, and a multitude of state universities and smaller private institutions host a full gamut of nonbeliever groups. Harvard has had a Chaplaincy of Humanism for over 30 years. Even our new president noted in his inaugural address: “We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and nonbelievers.” According to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 16 percent of Americans identify themselves as atheist, agnostic, or “nothing in particular.” Nonbelievers outnumber Jews, Muslims, and Hindus combined. Surely, then, shouldn't the University be making an effort to recruit and support this increasingly important segment of America?
As a humanist and member of the American Humanist Association, I find it difficult to ignore the countless numbers of lives lost and the anguish suffered in the name of religion over the history of the Earth. Princeton is fond of considering itself “in the nation’s service” and more recently in the service of all nations. In my view, the time is long past due to leave all religions behind. Humankind has been gifted through evolution with an intrinsic sense of morality, ethics, and altruism. Reality is or will be explained by the sciences. Belief in the supernatural is increasingly passe. Regrettably, Princeton appears to have failed to realize this and is woefully falling behind not only its Ivy League competitors, but other institutions as well. The message is simple: Do the right thing. Be good for goodness’ sake.
R.H. Van Fossen Jr. ’63
8 Years AgoGlorifying religious diversity
As a self-described godless heathen wondering if it’s not time to start hedging his bets, Merrell Noden ’78 (“Keeping the faith,” Dec. 17) faithfully represents Princeton University’s glorification of religious “diversity” at expense of the Truth.
In ignorance of the Bible and the Gospel of Christ, Noden calls upon the name of Jonathan Edwards in vain to promote the notion of universalism. To do so is not only to disparage President Edwards, but also the likes of C.S. Lewis, who pointed out so succinctly that Christ Jesus did not allow for such a thing. As Lewis said, either Christ Jesus was a lunatic, or else he is who he says he is. Jonathan Edwards was one of thousands of Princetonians who attest the latter.
It is a far cry from “specifying that ‘any Person of any religious Denomination whatsoever’ might attend” Princeton, to claiming that there are no absolutes — that Truth is relative, and all religions equal. Jonathan Edwards did not believe such nonsense, because he believed Christ Jesus, who says (John 8:24): “Therefore I told you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I am, you will die in your sins.” And (John 14:6): “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father except by me.”
Personally, I knew only two Princeton University deans (covering more than half the life of the University Chapel): Robert Russell Wicks and Ernest Gordon. Both believed in Christ Jesus, and like Jonathan Edwards, they would be appalled at atheist homosexual “marriage” ceremonies and pagan rituals being performed in the University Chapel. How far the mighty have fallen!
Alan D. Franklin ’43
8 Years AgoMulticultural events at the Chapel
I was disturbed by the letter of R.H. van Fossen Jr. ’63 (Feb. 11), with its implied claims to universal Truth. I should, in the interest of full disclosure, state that I am a secular humanist concerned with maintaining religious values but without supernatural claims.
As distinct from scientific truth, religious ideas are validated by faith, which has been described by Karen Armstrong (A History of God) as “a leap in the dark toward a reality that had to be taken on trust.” Faith is not dependent on the light of reason, but on the trust of the faithful person that what he perceives and feels is true and represents reality. The act of validation by faith is an individual thing, separate and different from person to person. The truth of a religious idea resides within the individual; it has no force or meaning to others whose faith leads them elsewhere.
Thus no one can support a claim of universal religious Truth. His truth is Truth to him and to those adherents whom he has convinced, but not to the adherent of another faith. All religions are not necessarily equally true, but we humans do not have the means to distinguish the True from all the rest.
For these reasons we have in this country a separation of church and state, and guarantees of freedom of conscience in our Constitution. And, for me and for these reasons, a policy at Princeton of encouraging religious diversity seems a wise one. Students need to be exposed to a variety of religious ideas and faiths. And also for these reasons, responding to the letter of John Brittain ’59 in the same issue, the policy of using the Chapel for multicultural or multifaith events, rather than limiting it strictly to Christian celebrations, seems also wise to me.
William H. Hudnut III ’54
8 Years AgoA commitment to searching for truth
As an undergraduate, I wrote my thesis on Samuel Stanhope Smith, Witherspoon’s son-in-law and successor as president of the College of New Jersey. Witherspoon and Smith began the traditions of Princeton in the nation’s service and a more latitudinarian approach to the heavily doctrinal (Presbyterian) 18th-century curriculum. Smith believed the academies and colleges of his day should provide easy access to the arts and sciences, and called places like Princeton “elementary schools for training a constant succession of wise and enlightened statesmen for the republic.” He wrote to Benjamin Rush 1760 that “the diffusion of knowledge is the diffusion of virtue and freedom.”
So, against the wishes of a conservative board of trustees, for whom his views were anathema, Smith hired the first undergraduate teacher of chemistry and natural sciences in America, John Maclean. His spirit of tolerant catholicity led him to defend the right of persons to hold whatever opinions they wished, without censure, including the right of Old Testament figures to practice polygamy, and the right of his universalist cousin, the Rev. Samuel Blair, to believe that “all men would be saved.” Smith employed anthropology and other empirical scientific insights from the Age of Enlightenment to oppose “creationism” and a narrow Biblicism that literally interpreted the Book of Genesis. And he declared: “I do not intend to wrap myself in the shroud of orthodoxy with lifeless acquiescence in established systems.” The upshot of his conflict with the trustees was, sadly, that he was forced to resign in 1812.
But Smith saved Princeton’s curriculum from stultifying narrowness and its spirit from subservience to institutionalized orthodoxy. That is his enduring legacy, and I was so pleased to read about the multidenominational nature of this year’s Opening Exercises and the institutional support students are receiving “in their choice of religious beliefs and practices,” because it strikes me that the great Princeton commitment to searching for truth wherever the search may lead, is yet alive and well after two centuries and more, in “the best old place of all.”
Jeffrey Shallit ’79
8 Years AgoWhat about the skeptics?
For the third time in 12 years, the Princeton Alumni Weekly has run a long and positive article about religion at Princeton — despite the fact that many (perhaps even most) Princeton students are not affiliated with a religious organization.
I ask the same question I asked four years ago (with no response from PAW editors): When will we see a story about the atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, and skeptics of Princeton?
George A. Johnson ’59
8 Years AgoFaith and freethinkers
I loved reading “Keeping the Faith” in the Dec. 17 issue of PAW, describing the varied religious expressions going on at today’s Princeton. It’s a nice contrast to my years at Princeton during the Eisenhower ’50s, when there was compulsory chapel, overt (and widely condoned) racial and religious prejudice, and a monochromatic undergraduate experience.
I’m glad Princeton now is multichromatic and that it apparently encourages multivariant religious expression.
Some of my darkest memories of ’50s Princeton were being compelled to troop in to chapel, where at a minimum of twice monthly, we had to listen to sonorous Scottish-inflected sermons assuming as a given that all of us were there to exalt the Presbyterian version of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. I wasn’t then the confirmed secular humanist that I am now, but I certainly didn’t hear anything in chapel that brought me closer to religion.
All in all, Princeton is a much different and better place today than when I went there.
Congratulations to the various religious coordinators and to President Tilghman for their leadership.
Rev. David Kim
8 Years AgoDescribing Manna's ministry
I was disheartened after reading an otherwise wonderful article on faith in the latest issue of the PAW. I have worked on Princeton’s campus for 14 years as the executive director of Manna Christian Fellowship, one of the religious groups referenced in this article. The sole description given of Manna was the following: “made up mostly of Asian-Americans.”
While the other organizations were described in terms of activities and the contributions they bring to the community, the author chose to use race as the exclusive description of Manna, with no further qualifications in the entire article. While Manna’s constituents are mostly of Asian descent, the organization consists of African-Americans, Latino-Americans, Caucasians, and international students from Europe, Africa, and Asia. Manna’s focus is “developing and engaging a gospel worldview,” a phrase reiterated at the weekly meetings of 70 to 90 students. Manna is not an ethnic ministry, and describing the ministry in this fashion alienates our constituents and wrongly labels the organization.
As one of the larger chaplaincies, Manna sponsors hundreds of events on campus, such as public lectures, a charity 5K Justice Run, and community-service projects. To stimulate reflective dialogue, Manna initiated a Christian journal, called Revisions, four years ago. Students have had hour-long, daily prayer meetings since 2002 to pray for students, alumni, and world concerns. They hold regional alumni gatherings around the world, including an annual alumni conference. Yet none of these things was mentioned in the PAW article.
It is sad that an article rightly celebrating religious diversity shows we still have far to go in breaking through superficial evaluations. What ought to characterize people and organizations is not merely ethnicity, but the actions and contributions they bring to make their community great.
Erika L. Gilson
8 Years AgoLooking for female faces
Looking at the Dec. 17 cover and the cover story, “Keeping the Faith,” I missed seeing some female faces. With an almost 50 percent representation at Princeton, why were none visible, in particular in talks with Sohaib Sultan after weekly prayer service?
Robert Tellander ’60
8 Years AgoInviting the 'neighbors' over
As a retired former totemistic figure, the Princeton Tiger, I was amused to learn that the Princeton University Chapel would celebrate Diwali on Nov. 8.
Having been invited to preach by Dean Ernest Gordon on “The Politics of Religion,” a course I taught for several years in the sociology department at Sonoma State University in California, I had presumed that the Chapel, despite its overpowering medieval appearance, invites the unusual to rekindle the intellectual-inquiry component of religion, which we seldom perceive as “faith.” To those who view the Chapel as an escape — a “sanctuary” — from diversity and therefore “holy,” I think this perception demeans the living Body of Christ, and creates a more fixed and lesser image of Christianity.
Somehow, inviting the “neighbors” over to celebrate at our home has a much more Christian manifestation about it. What if we treated all persons as if they were Christian — and not make it a prerequisite that they become like us if they want to maintain the relationship? Instead, we avoid them because they are not like us. What kind of Samaritans do we think we are? I think the “good news” might get out if we reached out more and farther.
Stop hoarding love; express it — even if it means you’ll light someone else’s oil lamps. Lest we forget the silly maidens at the wedding feast who used up all their oil waiting and missed the big event. Happy Diwali, and keep smiling.
Arvin Anderson ’59
8 Years AgoFaces of faith
I suppose that when I read the very positive article “Faces of Faith” (cover story, Dec. 17), my reaction as a fully fledged atheist (since age 21) was interesting. I sadly note that while the University clearly tolerates nonbelievers as well as believers of all types, the exclusion of recognition of atheists and agnostics as a growing majority by the general American culture still exists. While it always has been possible to be an open non-believer in educated circles, in past years it was always considered awkward in public and sometimes professional or other working environments. The liberal approach in supporting a myriad of beliefs in the Princeton Chapel system is highly commendable, and emphasizes the future pattern of those who would continue their faith.
This profound atheist finds that if deities are necessary to sustain the individual through life, returning to the deism of our early founding fathers is most potentially rewarding. Or the return to the worship of most of our ancestors, the deification of the sun, which after all is the ultimate creator and will be the Armageddon for humanity should it decide to blink out or blow up.
Perhaps the faculty of the Center for Human Values or others could reflect in PAW about the role of unorganized religion and especially atheism or agnosticism as answers for life in the context of earlier religious tradition. It does not upset most American atheists that religions exist, only that some choose to hate or vilify such positions as a threat to “good” living and an honest lifestyle. It is possible for atheists to accept the social contract with most societies around the world. So let us not step on each other’s toes too much, or proselytize each other too much, or send missionaries to challenge the working beliefs of other cultures, unless the culture welcomes them.
Anonymous
8 Years AgoFor the record