Major Construction Underway for New Geo-Exchange Energy System

Thousands of holes, or bores, are being dug underneath the south side of campus for a new system to reduce emissions

This is a photo of the thermal piping installed near Jadwin Gym — four big black pipes down in a dug-out area of reddish dirt..

The thermal piping installed near Jadwin Gym will help to heat and cool campus buildings.

Whiting-Turner

Julie Bonette
By Julie Bonette

Published March 24, 2022

3 min read

Princeton University is investing hundreds of millions of dollars below our feet, digging holes 600 and 850 feet deep for two new state-of-the-art geo-exchange systems. They make up one of the biggest components of the University’s plan to achieve net-zero carbon emissions from campus by Princeton’s 300th anniversary in 2046. 

Currently, the University runs a steam distribution plant and a cogeneration system within the central energy plant to produce electricity and steam for the campus, but some parts predate World War I. Rather than rebuilding what is now considered mediocre technology, the University sought out something newer and better. 

Enter geo-exchange. Thousands of holes, or bores, are being dug underneath the south side of campus near Fitzrandolph Road and across Lake Carnegie at the new Lake Campus. Once the bores are in place, long tubes bent in a U-shape will be inserted and filled with water to capture and store heat in the ground. That stored heat, along with heat pumps and thermal energy storage tanks, will be used to heat and cool buildings. Also underway is the conversion of campus buildings to utilize this hot-water system rather than steam.

The Thermally Integrated Geo-Exchange Resource (TIGER) facility on Fitzrandolph is expected to be completed in May 2023, while the Central Utility Building (CUB), which will distribute hot and cold water to the new Lake Campus buildings, should be finished this fall. The Lewis Center for the Arts, Lakeside Graduate Housing, and the Lawrence Apartments are already operating on geo-exchange. 

The systems are extremely energy efficient, and, since most of the equipment is housed underground, the land above can be used for other purposes, including athletic fields and a parking garage. Part of a burgeoning trend of geo-exchange systems in higher education, Princeton’s system is one of the largest, according to a February article on the Energy News Network website.

“We always talk about Princeton as a lighthouse institution that people pay attention to,” said Forrest Meggers, an associate professor of architecture and the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, who also serves as co-chair of the Princeton Sustainability Committee. As a result, the University was “willing to take the more expensive pathway, because it’s important.”

An exact figure for Princeton’s new systems was unavailable, according to Thomas Nyquist, executive director of facilities engineering, though he said it was “hundreds of millions of dollars.” 

This doesn’t mean the old infrastructure is going away, according to Ted Borer, Princeton’s energy plant manager, who noted that having on-site power generation during Superstorm Sandy in 2012 was vital.

Meanwhile, students and faculty are testing and measuring the old and new systems as part of the Campus as Lab initiative, which uses Princeton’s campus for sustainability research and experiential learning. Meggers’ research was key in determining the depth at which to dig for the most efficient and cost-effective geo-exchange bores.

“Some of my colleagues complained about how noisy the geo-thermal drilling was in the summer. And I’m like, ‘Are you kidding me? Do you know how important this is to carbon emissions?’” Meggers said. “I think there needs to be a little more ‘we’re going to save the world’ attitude about the project.”

Not all of the University’s neighbors agree. Last July, Helen Nissenbaum, a local resident, filed a lawsuit to prevent the construction of the TIGER facility due to noise concerns and zoning issues. The plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed by the Mercer County Superior Court, which upheld the Princeton Planning Board’s decision on March 29. 

After the ruling, University spokesman Michael Hotchkiss said, “The University looks forward to using the TIGER geo-exchange facility in its commitment to sustainability by meeting campus energy needs without using fossil fuels.”

With the new system in place, Princeton will be on track to achieve net-zero by 2046, according to a November article on the University homepage. By that milestone 300th anniversary, Princeton expects to require roughly one-fifth or one-sixth of the energy it used last year to heat and cool its buildings, even as the campus expands. 


This story was updated to include the adjudication of the lawsuit against the University and the Princeton Planning Board. 

5 Responses

Lisa-Nicolle Grist *92

2 Years Ago

Geo-Exchange and Land Use

Did anyone else notice the irony of building an “extremely energy-efficient” geo-exchange system “underground [so] the land above can be used for … a parking garage”?!

Rocky Semmes ’79

2 Years Ago

Looking for More Details on Geo-Exchange

Like Tantalous, the mythological king cursed by tree-borne fruit just beyond his reach, we too are teased about “one of the largest” geo-exchange systems in higher education but never provided satisfying substantive elaboration about it for our fuller understanding (“Laying the Groundwork,” April issue). Inquiring minds wish to know how the “long tubes bent in a U-shape” relate to the “holes 600 and 850 feet deep.” It is understood that supply-chain issues put paper at a premium recently but a referenced link in the article will be easy enough to include when future articles encounter similar limits.

Rick Mott ’73

2 Years Ago

Proposing a Small Modular Reactor

I read with interest about the geo-exchange system being installed.  I could not find an expected electricity reduction percentage, but Xiaobing Liu in 2017 analyzed 26 existing systems and reported 21 percent to 66 percent reduction in primary energy (electricity).  Where will the remaining primary energy come from?

In 2011, after Fukushima, Tom Nyquist was kind enough to listen to my presentation to consider a small modular nuclear reactor for Princeton without throwing me bodily out of his office.  Alumni may request a copy through my Tigernet email.  Princeton can no longer be the leader here, because the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is working with Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation of Canada to install a micro-reactor on campus.  It will generate 5 MWe of power per module.  The modules can be ganged and modulated to meet demand, and by design, as its name implies, they are physically incapable of melting down even without external water or power — no Fukushima for Princeton.  Each module is 13m high by 3.5m in diameter, sealed and sited underground, and the initial fuel load lasts 20 years.

According to Princeton's electricity tracker, the campus is consuming about 15 MW on a cool April Sunday.  I assume power needs go up substantially in summer, as heating is mostly done by gas-fired steam in the cogen plant.  Two to four USNC modules should cover the University's remaining power needs entirely, likely at a cost comparable to or less than the geothermal installation, with zero emissions.  Waste heat can charge the geothermal system, further reducing electricity needs.  This could be done substantially before 2046, with a module expected to go online in Chalk River, Canada, in 2026.  Tom, please call UI-UC.

I'm sure this idea will really get Ms. Nissenbaum going, but in for a penny, in for a pound.

Jon Arnon ’75

2 Years Ago

A Day in the Life

I read the news today, oh boy
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all
Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall

Chris Brandt ’65

2 Years Ago

Another Lighthouse Opportunity

PAW reported the new geo-exchange heating and cooling systems, intended to make Princeton net-zero by 2046, will cost “hundreds of millions of dollars” and save far more over time (On the Campus, April issue).

Of course, this is a good thing, and Princeton will serve “as a lighthouse institution that people pay attention to,” as associate professor Forrest Meggers said in the story. True enough, in a small way, though Princeton is not the first; there are many towns, cities, and private institutions that are already moving in the same direction. And allow me to point out the disjuncture between these laudable efforts to shrink the University’s carbon footprint, and its endowment holding $1.7 billion in fossil-fuel investments (On the Campus, May issue). Princeton is still too late to be the first lighthouse on the block, since Harvard and many other institutions have already divested, while Princeton is dithering along, debating whether using a weasel-word like “dissociation” will satisfy. It doesn’t.

If Princeton makes one small patch of New Jersey carbon neutral, that’s obviously good, but (better late than never) publicly divesting from ExxonMobil might help lead the rest of the country to do likewise. Besides, 2046 is still over the horizon and may be too late anyway, whereas divestment could have an outsized impact now.

Why not triple Princeton’s lighthouse-ness? Divesting nearly $2 billion of fossil-fuel investments and investing hundreds of millions in renewable energy add up to real institutional leadership. Come on, Princeton, do the lighthouse-institution thing — what are you afraid of?

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics