A New Direction

New head of jazz studies seeks to blend contemporary with tradition

Rudresh Mahanthappa, director of the Program in Jazz Studies

Jimmy Katz

By Allie Wenner

Published Jan. 27, 2017

2 min read

The new director of Princeton’s jazz studies program says that while jazz is often dismissed by the public as the music of an older generation, he has made it his mission to change that presumption. 

Rudresh Mahanthappa, an accomplished alto saxophonist and composer (NPR Music’s Jazz Critics Poll named his album Bird Calls the best of 2015), succeeded Anthony Branker ’80 as director of the jazz program at the start of the academic year. Branker, who founded the program, said in an email to PAW that “the Department of Music wanted to move in a different direction with the jazz program ... it was time for me to retire after 27 years of service to Princeton.” 

Mahanthappa last fall appointed Grammy-nominated pianist and composer Darcy James Argue as director of the program’s big-band-style group, the Creative Large Ensemble. Mahanthappa scaled back the number of concerts for each performance group to one per semester, allowing students more time in rehearsal to learn about the history of the music and to consider how it fits into today’s world. He is also selecting music from different time periods, ranging from 1940s-era tunes by artists such as Thelonious Monk to pieces by contemporary artists. “It’s important to see how the tradition relates to the contemporary,” Mahanthappa said.

He said he plans to make collaboration between jazz musicians and other artists a hallmark of the program, and hopes to create opportunities for his students to work with classical and electronic musicians, the dance and theater programs, and others. 

“Jazz isn’t just playing in clubs and making records and playing jazz festivals,” Mahanthappa said. “The climate for jazz is pretty rough — budgets have been slashed, there are fewer places to play, and there are more musicians fighting for fewer performing situations. But I think there is a lot of space in collaboration: If people can think outside of their immediate box, there’s a lot of meaningful work that can be done.” 

This year, there are three instrumental jazz groups on campus: the Creative Large Ensemble, a seven-student small group, and a four-student small group. Mahanthappa has commissioned Grammy-winning jazz pianist Billy Childs to write a 20-minute piece for the Creative Large Ensemble, which will perform it May 13 in Richardson Auditorium. Mahanthappa has also invited tenor saxophonist Walter Smith III to perform with the seven-person group, which will be playing Smith’s music, March 5.

“I’ve never looked forward to a concert as much as I did for the [Creative Large Ensemble] concert” in December, said Alex Laurenzi ’20. “In my experience, you don’t usually play many songs in big-band concerts, but I think we had 12 or 14 tunes that we performed. And we had the full spectrum of big-band music — Duke Ellington to very contemporary stuff, and everything in between. It was a really good kickoff for what our band will evolve into.”

Mahanthappa said he hopes to include more people in the program. Some students who auditioned for the ensembles at the beginning of the year didn’t make the cut, and he wants to include everyone interested in jazz, regardless of experience level. “There should be a place for people to get better,” he said.

Branker said many of the goals he had set for the program had been realized during his years at the University. “It was an honor and a true pleasure to have had the opportunity to come back to Princeton and develop a jazz program in 1989, [which] was actually a dream I had while an undergraduate,” he said.

2 Responses

Gary Getz ’76

7 Years Ago

As a co-founder and the first President of the Princeton University Jazz Ensemble, I’m excited to read about Mr. Mahanthappa’s arrival on the Jazz scene at Princeton and very interested to see and hear how the program develops within his stated philosophy.

As for Mr. Branker, it’s clear that the Princeton jazz community owes him a great deal for his steadfast leadership over the years; if I had one wish, it would be that he had formed closer bonds during his tenure with those former students, including many of my life-long friends, who brought big-band jazz back to Princeton after a lengthy hiatus in the form of the Jazz Ensemble in 1974.

Over the years, it often seemed to us that he wanted to distance what the Jazz Ensemble became from its beginnings. Even his closing quote in the PAW article about “developing” a jazz program in 1989 based on a dream he had during his undergraduate days seems a bit disingenuous to me: Perhaps he had that dream while he was sitting in rehearsal as a member of the Jazz Ensemble in 1979?

Here’s hoping for closer bonds between Mr. Mahanthappa, and the future of Princeton Jazz, and its past.

Ed Polcer ’58

7 Years Ago

I read, with enthusiasm and anticipation, of Princeton’s music department’s wanting to move in a new direction with the jazz program (On the Campus, Feb. 8). I share many of Rudresh Mahanthappa’s views, i.e., blending contemporary with tradition, space for collaboration, thinking outside of the box, etc. I especially encourage working with the dance program. 

If it is Princeton’s intent to help its student musicians prepare for a career in jazz, a considerable amount of emphasis should be placed on studying styles that originated prior to the bebop compositions of Thelonious Monk. The classic styles of Louis Armstrong, Benny Goodman, and Eddie Condon are currently embraced by hundreds of young, working jazz musicians. There are thousands of “swing dancers” from China, Korea, Europe, South America, and, of course, from the U.S. who enjoy dancing to classic jazz, performed by live bands. 

Mr. Mahanthappa’s observation that “the climate for jazz is rough” is no more relevant today than it has been since I started playing it at Princeton in 1954. There are 40 to 50 venues in New York City and New Orleans where jazz is performed, often offering opportunities for dancing. Today’s climate is, in fact, encouraging.

I fail to understand the importance given by most college jazz-study programs to big-band-style groups. I believe that it is misleading and irrelevant to guide aspiring musicians toward a “big-band” career. Efforts could be redirected to encourage additional small groups.

My best wishes to Mr. Mahanthappa and the Department of Music for this new direction.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News