Princeton Doubles Down on DEI Amid Nationwide Attacks

The University has been expanding and fortifying investments in inclusive programs while adjusting to evolving laws

Diverse group of male and female students from the Freshman Scholars Institute

2024 Freshman Scholars Institute participants

Courtesy of the Emma Bloomberg Center

Julie Bonette
By Julie Bonette

Published Dec. 11, 2024

4 min read

The pressure on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at colleges across the nation has been building, and the campaign and subsequent reelection of President Donald Trump has only intensified concerns of many DEI advocates.

Trump has proposed eliminating the U.S. Department of Education, which upholds laws that prohibit discrimination, and in 2020, the Trump administration called training that focuses on race theory and white privilege “divisive, anti-American propaganda.”

As of November 2024, The Chronicle of Higher Education had documented 213 college campuses in 33 states that have pulled back on DEI initiatives or cut them altogether. Public institutions in conservative-leaning states are facing the most pressure, but some private schools, like MIT and Harvard, are also rolling back policies.

But Princeton administrators have voiced steadfast support of DEI initiatives. Michele Minter, the University’s vice provost for institutional equity and diversity, has “seen the national climate get much more complex around some of these issues,” and she acknowledges that “many other campuses are facing some very significant attacks.” She credits the support of University presidents Shirley Tilghman and Christopher Eisgruber ’83 for Princeton’s commitment to and expansion of DEI work despite necessary adjustments to accommodate evolving legal and regulatory requirements.

In his January 2024 State of the University letter, Eisgruber wrote, “America’s leading universities are more dedicated to scholarly excellence today than at any previous point in their history, and our commitment to inclusivity is essential to that excellence.”

Minter estimates there are about 75 DEI practitioners at the University spanning many different offices. They meet monthly as a group over breakfast to build community, undergo professional development training, and discuss best practices, current issues, and the University’s values. Their work impacts the campus in ways both obvious and not so obvious, from language on job postings to partnerships with local community organizations.

Minter said the University is always trying to “do things in an appropriate and legal way, but also … keep doing the core work in keeping with Princeton’s values.”

“Our diversity and inclusion efforts are critical to our pursuit of the best available talent, wherever it may be found, and to our shared pursuit of knowledge and teaching.”

— Frederick Wherry *04, professor of sociology and the inaugural vice dean for diversity and inclusion in the Office of the Dean of the Faculty

As evidence, she points to “investments in innovative programs,” such as the Princeton Alliance for Collaborative Research and Innovation, which launched in 2022 and pairs Princeton faculty with those from five historically Black colleges and universities on a range of projects. New spaces and centers — such as the development of the AccessAbility Center, designed as a gathering space for all and opened in 2017, and the Emma Bloomberg Center for Access & Opportunity, which was established in 2021 and houses many longstanding DEI programs — are also proof of Princeton’s expansion.

“Our focus is really on educational access and opportunity,” said Khristina Gonzalez, director of the Emma Bloomberg Center, as well as “thinking about ways that we can ensure equity [from] the moment … students are considering whether they should go to college” through their college graduation.

Gonzalez’s staff of about 20 manages programs including the Princeton University Preparatory Program, which since 2001 has prepared local students for college; the Freshman Scholars Institute, for incoming freshmen; and the Transfer Scholars Initiative, which commenced in 2023 to support community college students in the state.

Abby Lu ’26, the outgoing DEI chair for the Undergraduate Student Government, appreciates that some University administrators are “very proactive when we reach out to them about things,” such as engaging in discussions around a gender-inclusive bathroom proposal for Hobson College, scheduled to open in 2027. Lu sometimes gets frustrated with timelines, but she believes Princeton has the systems in place to help those with diverse backgrounds reach their full potential.

Miles Smith, associate athletic director for diversity, equity, and inclusion, told PAW via email that his office reaches all of the more than 1,000 athletes at Princeton through team-specific programming and affinity groups. Within the last year, Jewish and Latinx athlete collectives were established, bringing the total number to five, and this summer, athletics ran the first iteration of Tigers Together Journey to Athletics, a partnership with nonprofit mentorship organizations serving K-5 students from central New Jersey and Philadelphia.

Andy Cofino returned to Princeton in 2024 as the inaugural assistant vice president for diversity, well-being, and belonging, after previously serving as Princeton’s program coordinator at the then-LGBT Center (now Gender + Sexuality Resource Center) from 2013 to ’18. After his six-year absence from the University, Cofino noticed a lot of changes, citing “a very socially and politically polarized environment and society,” which can make students at Princeton and elsewhere afraid to engage with one another and create tension and anxiety. He said he believes the University needs “to be responsive to the evolving needs of our students.”

Along with Minter and other DEI administrators PAW interviewed, Cofino credits the University’s leadership with providing a strong foundation for support on which the entire community can build.

“Perhaps people seem to think that diversity, equity, and inclusion only happen in certain places, but really it’s up to all of us within the University setting to ensure that every student that is here on our campus and every [alum] who graduates feels a sense of connection, a sense of belonging, and affinity with the institution, because they have felt welcomed, included, affirmed, and valued,” said Cofino.

Frederick Wherry *04, a professor of sociology and the inaugural vice dean for diversity and inclusion in the Office of the Dean of the Faculty, sees “the turmoil out there” related to DEI, but he said Princeton is “not moving with the vagaries and looking up to see where the wind blows.”

No matter who is occupying the Oval Office, the University’s “mission remains the same,” according to Wherry. “Our diversity and inclusion efforts are critical to our pursuit of the best available talent, wherever it may be found, and to our shared pursuit of knowledge and teaching.”

Citing students, faculty, and alumni who are working in big teams on ambitious projects like building spaceships and discovering cures for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Wherry said, “If you start having inclusion issues on the team, then the work can slow down or stop. And so, part of what people don’t see is when we say that diversity and inclusion [are] critical for the operations of the University, we mean quite literally.”

3 Responses

Maxwell Steinhardt ’78

1 Week Ago

Doubting the Value of DEI

DEI has increasingly seemed to me to be far more a political ambition than some sort of moral imperative. The broad experience of DEI in, and significantly, outside of academia suggests that it is ineffective in achieving a recognized and admired transformation. Instead, we see a disappointing displacement of meritocracy, and DEI’s lack of common sense or a convincing moral compass. It is noteworthy that DEI promotes actions considered to be racist. Until DEI as an ambition can demonstrate acceptable efficacy, it will remain, in my view, a mechanism to supplant wise and proven performance standards with a now fading attempt at a newly defined sort of fairness. I am not sure how DEI ideas were ever really an improvement, and I continue to have serious doubts that DEI was really seriously thought through. In my view it is not wise to double down on DEI.

Bill Noonan ’77

1 Week Ago

Return to Meritocracy at Princeton

Assistant vice president for diversity Andy Cofino complains that a “socially and politically polarized environment and society” makes students at Princeton afraid to communicate with one another. That polarization is the direct result of DEI. The cure is a return to meritocracy. If Princeton plans to double down on DEI in violation of the law, it deserves to lose its federal funding.

Blair Perot ’87

4 Weeks Ago

University Values Vs. Civil Rights Law

“Do things in an appropriate and legal way, but also … keep doing the core work in keeping with Princeton’s values.”
— Michele Minter, the University’s vice provost for institutional equity and diversity

Interesting thing to worry about. Why would the "University's values" be running into some conflicts with the law?

Would DEI be just another way for the University to be racist, and thereby skirting the edges of civil rights law? Certainly numerous articles have recently suggested that DEI is basically nice words for racism. Could that be a possibility?

Seeing as Princeton, and the affirmative action it just recently strongly advocated for, was just found to be racist and flat-out violating (not skirting) civil rights laws against racial discrimination, wouldn’t the University be a bit more careful about violating civil rights law yet again?

Seeing as they just got the law wrong, does it seem bold to go down almost exactly the same road with almost exactly the same lame justifications of implementing racial discrimination and then erroneously calling that discrimination "University values" and thinking that makes it OK under the law?

The University's commitment to feeling morally superior to others doesn’t in reality actually make it superior. Just look at the accompanying picture to see with your very own eyes what "diversity" means in reality when it is touted as a "University value". Just look at what they actually do. Pictures don’t lie.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics