Fourteen University departments and programs will no longer require the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) for graduate admission, the latest in a series of actions by the Graduate School to encourage broader diversity.
“To achieve our academic mission requires Princeton to identify, attract, and develop the most promising individuals from as many segments of society as possible,” Renita Miller, the Graduate School’s associate dean for access, diversity, and inclusion, said in a statement.
Of Princeton’s incoming U.S. graduate students, a record 43 percent are minorities, and 28 percent are first-generation and/or come from low-income households. Underrepresented-minority grad students increased from 13 percent in 2014–15 to 23 percent this year, also a record figure.
Departments that made the GRE optional cited concerns that the costs of the exam ($205) and of test preparation disproportionately affect underserved students. Critics also question what the test scores actually prove.
“Studies suggest that GRE scores are not great indicators of graduate-school success and underserve students who cannot afford test prep or to take the exam multiple times,” said Professor Zemer Gitai, former director of graduate studies in the molecular biology department.
Professor Johannes Haubold, director of graduate studies in the classics department, cited concern “that standardized tests are culturally biased in favor of certain groups, and that they end up testing primarily how good one is at taking tests.”
In an email, Miller pointed to a number of factors that have increased the diversity of the grad-student population. They include the Princeton Prospective Ph.D. Preview, which brought potential students from underrepresented backgrounds to campus Oct. 3–4 as an introduction to what an education at the University could be like. The program began last year.
The Graduate School is accepting applications for a new one-year predoctoral fellowship initiative to give students a year to prepare before officially starting a Ph.D. program. Miller said students from historically underrepresented groups and those who actively work to promote diversity are encouraged to apply. Princeton representatives also visit historically black colleges and universities and Hispanic-serving institutions.
Other programs are designed to support these students once they are admitted, Miller said. The Graduate Scholars Program pairs students with a dean or staff member who serves as a mentor during the student’s first year. In the Diversity Fellows program, graduate students help build community by organizing social and academic events.
“These initiatives have added to a greater sense of community and belonging, which is very important for creating an inclusive environment,” Miller said.
The departments and programs dropping the GRE are art and archaeology, classics, comparative literature, ecology and evolutionary biology, English, French and Italian, geosciences, molecular biology, music composition, neuroscience, psychology, religion, Slavic languages and literatures, and Spanish and Portugese. Twenty-nine departments and programs continue to require the exam.
4 Responses
Bo Lin *90
5 Years AgoGRE Scores Are an Indicator
This is political correctness to the extreme, particularly for departments in the science field such as geosciences and molecular biology.
The duty of graduate schools, particular for Ph.Ds, is to teach people to further human knowledge based on existing learning, and GRE scores are an indication of how well one has absorbed fundamental knowledge in a given field. Therefore, the advertised approach is not recommended.
The given reason that the GRE test is too expensive is just an excuse. If that is the only reason for trying this less than thoughtful idea, particularly for departments in the science field, why not provide some funding for students to take GRE test in schools with a high representation of underprivileged minorities? Surprisingly, such a simple idea is not tested first to 1,000 “worthy” students, which surely is much less expensive then providing one year's funding for one student in each of the 14 “enlightened” departments. I feel sad to support Princeton so that my beloved University can wantonly throw my hard-earned money away without doing any basic test first.
Saddened,
Terry Wintroub ’69
5 Years AgoGRE Policies Raise Questions
Re “Rethinking the GRE” (On the Campus, Oct. 23): Fourteen departments and programs will no longer require the GRE for graduate admission, but 29 will continue to require it. Are we to infer that two-thirds of graduate departments and programs don’t need — or is it want? — any broader “diversity”? That they are satisfied with how well they “identify, attract, and develop the most promising individuals from as many segments of society as possible”?
Or maybe we’re to infer that two-thirds of Princeton’s graduate departments and programs discount Professor Zemer Gitai’s claim — oops, I mean “suggestion” — that GRE scores “are not great indicators of graduate-school success.”
Seems to me that somebody is wrong, either Gitai or two-thirds of the departments and programs. Is there some reason that Princeton hasn’t researched and found out who is right and then brought the wrong parties into compliance?
Hey, wait! Maybe Gitai is wrong and the test is a great indicator of graduate-school success, but the 14 that are dropping the GRE requirement are less concerned with graduate-school success than they are with being “diverse and inclusive.”
I’m wondering also if I’m the only one wondering why PAW didn’t ask my questions in this article.
Norman Ravitch *62
4 Years AgoRecognition for Abilities
What the heck is so grand about diversity? People who attend find schools and get good degrees there want to be recognized for their abilities, not for the drop of black or brown or yellow blood that somehow got into their veins and arteries.
Emil M. Friedman *73
5 Years AgoEnhancing Diversity
Dropping the GRE will certainly enhance diversity by admitting less-qualified students.