Student Essay Touches a Nerve

Privilege: Checked and Debated

Fortgang ’17

Fortgang ’17

Courtesy Fox News Channel

Placeholder author icon
By Mark F. Bernstein ’83

Published Jan. 21, 2016

1 min read

A freshman’s essay for the Princeton Tory set off a national stir over the issues of racial and gender privilege.

Tal Fortgang ’17 wrote in the April 2 issue that he is frequently told to “check your privilege” — the inherent social benefits enjoyed by virtue of being white and male — when he expresses opinions contrary to what he perceives as liberal orthodoxies.

“The phrase, handed down by my moral superiors, descends recklessly, like an Obama-sanctioned drone, and aims laser-like at my pinkish-peach complexion, my maleness, and the nerve I display in offering an opinion rooted in a personal Weltanschauung,” Fortgang wrote for the Tory, a conservative student publication. He cited his family history, including grandparents who fled the Nazis and emigrated to America penniless, as rebuttal to claims that he enjoys special status because of his race and gender.

The essay made national news and went viral on the Internet. It also generated controversy within the Princeton community, fostering long debates in The Daily Princetonian and the Parent-Net online discussion group. Fortgang declined to speak to PAW for this article.

“No one is asking a privileged person to apologize for his or her lifestyle,” wrote Morgan Jerkins ’14 in a response to Fortgang for Ebony. “All we ask is for you to be aware that not everyone has the same experiences as you.”

READ MORE:

Tal Fortgang ’17’s essay for the Princeton Tory

Morgan Jerkins ’14’s essay for Ebony

1 Response

Richard Jackson ’62

8 Years Ago

Fitzgerald and Privilege

If Scott Fitzgerald 1917 revisited campus today, how would he respond if challenged to “check your privilege” (On the Campus, June 4)? Admittedly privileged by middle-class standards of the day, he was still an outsider looking in, less fortunate by far than those he envied and made immortal. No doubt he would be flummoxed by the question, as was Tal Fortgang ’17, according to The New York Times of May 3. Should he apologize for his “seven friends and the trees and buildings,” or Fortgang for his European origins? It is an intrusive and aggressive question, undermining the benefits to all of today’s diversity, to which Fitzgerald sadly was never exposed.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics