Table talk: Drinking, sex, and how things go wrong

Placeholder author icon
By Spencer Gaffney ’12
1 min read

Half a dozen students and two University staff members sat around a table in the Rockefeller College common room on a Friday afternoon in early December, discussing the mysteries of the Dance Floor Make-Out.

The group, all male by design, was one of several tables having conversations as part of the Alcohol Coalition Committee’s fall workshop on gender, sexual assault, and alcohol. Dana Weinstein ’12, who helped plan the event, said the goal was to allow students to explore topics that are “rarely, if ever, spoken about in an open manner” and foster future conversations about sex and alcohol.  

The men at the table had been asked to define “consent”; their conversation naturally focused on the Street, the ultimate confluence of sex and alcohol for students. One senior (PAW agreed to the organizers’ requirement that students could be identified only by gender and class) said it often was difficult for men to interpret what, if anything, an encounter at an eating club meant.

“A lot of males are utterly incompetent about reading clues,” he said.  

This kind of anthropological investigation of a night out at Princeton was a constant feature of the conversation — trying to figure out how the social scene works, and when and why things go wrong. Later in the afternoon, the all-male table paired up with an all-female counterpart. Those from the women’s table noted that their perspective of a night out at Princeton changed as they got older.

“Freshman girls believe that the Street is a good place to start a relationship,” said a sophomore woman. “They’re more likely to go farther sexually because there’s an expectation of commitment.”

Though rigorously discussed and explored, the eating clubs were not demonized in the conversations. Anita McLean, director of Counseling and Psychological Services, made it clear in her opening comments that the event coordinators understood the central role of the Street in Princeton’s social scene.

The eating clubs “offer more than free beer,” McLean said. “They offer an incredible opportunity to connect with people, a sense of belonging, and relationships that will carry on to Wall Street, the White House, [and] the Pentagon.”

English professor Jeff Nunokawa, master of Rockefeller College, called the conjunction of sex and alcohol “potent” and “irresistible,” but cautioned against its dangers.

1 Response

John F. Fay *85

8 Years Ago

Don't overlook chastity

With the article “Table talk: Drinking, sex, and how things go wrong” (Campus Notebook, Jan. 19), I see that sexism is alive and well at Princeton. One student noted that “a lot of males are utterly incompetent about reading clues.” The editors thought enough of the quote that it was highlighted in large type as a centerpiece of the article. But there was never a hint that perhaps some women are incompetent about letting their preferences be known. As usual, men are blamed and women receive a free pass.

Also glaringly missing from the article was any hint that perhaps chastity would be the best policy — or even that it is an acceptable alternative lifestyle. A few minutes’ thought will make it clear that if there is no sexual encounter, the question of whether it is consensual or forced is moot.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics