Jewish Alumni Conference: A Century of Jewish Life

Once ‘insiders and outsiders’ at the same time, alumni return to a more welcoming Princeton

Shabbat dinner with Rabbi Darcie DuBois Crystal ’97.

Sameer A. Khan

Placeholder author icon
By Michael Goldstein ’78

Published May 5, 2016

3 min read

About 900 alumni and guests came to campus April 14–16 to celebrate a century of Jewish life at Princeton. For alumni, the conference — called L’Chaim: To Life! — was a time to schmooze, attend lectures, and recall both the good and the bad of their time at Princeton.

“We don’t want to just say things used to be bad and now they’re fine,” noted President Eisgruber ’83, who participated in much of the conference. Eisgruber seemed to strike a special chord with many participants when he identified himself as Princeton’s “second Jewish president” (Harold Shapiro *64 was the first) and recounted how he discovered his own Jewish roots late in life, a secret hidden by his refugee mother. He poignantly discussed how Jews on campus often felt like both insiders and outsiders. “We love this place but we want to be honest about its history,” he said.

Although Jews have attended Princeton since the 19th century (see timeline), organized Jewish religious activity at Princeton began in 1915–16, when Rabbi Harry K. Jacobs visited the handful of Jewish students. At a lunchtime discussion with Shapiro, former President Bill Bowen *58 noted that over the years, Jewish students often “felt like guests, not hosts” — and he did much to improve the environment during his tenure.

Conference activities included lectures on astronomy, the economy, and Judaic studies; panels on student and religious life; an arch sing by the student a cappella group Koleinu, which performs Jewish music; and a comedic latke-hamantaschen debate (hamantaschen, the pastry ridiculed as “a mere confection” by pro-potato Team Latke, won). Brandeis University professor Jonathan Sarna, a leading scholar of American Jewish history, put the experience of Jews at Princeton into historical perspective, and alumni genealogists gave tips on tracing family histories and finding lost relatives. There were celebrations of Jewish food, music, and jokes.

Jeremy Ben-Ami ’84, founder and president of the liberal “pro-Israel, pro-peace” lobbying group J Street; and Martin Kramer ’75 *82, president of Shalem College in Israel and a scholar of Middle East politics, discussed Israeli policy and Israel-U.S. relations in a lively session that illustrated the policy divisions among American Jews.

Princeton’s Jewish history was uncovered and told in a senior thesis by Abby Klionsky ’14, who found that Jewish life at Princeton was created largely by students. Marcus Lester Aaron 1920 helped form a small student congregation, and in 1919 gathered 10 students for services, forming the first campus minyan, or prayer quorum.

Nearly 30 years later, Ernest Stock ’49, a German refugee whose father survived Buchenwald, co-organized the 1947 service that inaugurated Princeton’s Student Hebrew Association — inviting Albert Einstein, who spoke to the 40 students about the importance of belonging to a Jewish community. (At the alumni conference, Rabbi Julie Roth, executive director of the Center for Jewish Life, looked around the multipurpose room at Frist Campus Center during a prayer service and exclaimed: “Einstein would be amazed!”)

Veterans returning from World War II made Princeton more open, and the “dirty bicker” in 1958 marked the beginning of the end of the old system. “What I found most fascinating and surprising,” Klionsky said, “was the degree to which the Jewish alumni I interviewed did not believe themselves to have been slighted in any way by anti-Semitism on campus.”

Recent decades have seen an increasing willingness to accommodate Jews at Princeton; today, the 23-year-old Center for Jewish Life offers kosher dining, social activities, and religious services. “Once infamous for its anti-Semitism,” said Roth, “Princeton is now positioned as a thought leader and innovator in Jewish life on campus.”

Wrapping up the conference was speaker Mark Wilf ’84, best known for his family’s ownership of the Minnesota Vikings football team. He related how his “Babu Miriam” and father barely survived the Holocaust, and reminded the crowd what a privilege a Princeton education was. He urged participants to “reflect and think about your own journey to get here,” and to stay involved, mentor, and give back.

2 Responses

April C. Armstrong *14

8 Years Ago

I found earlier records of Jewish presence at Princeton while preparing a blog post for Mudd Library, dating back to 1809, when Mordecai Myers of the Class of 1812 arrived. Records suggest there were at least five Jewish students at Princeton prior to the Civil War: http://bit.ly/1Nyhsrr

John V.H. Dippel ’68

8 Years Ago

Reading in the May 11 issue about the celebration of Jewish life at Princeton makes me proud and worried — proud that my University has such a long record of inclusion, but worried that such assertions of group identification may divide Princeton into ethnic, racial, and religious enclaves at the expense of affection for the University as a whole. This is already happening on many campuses as minorities call for more affirmative action and sensitivity to their particular needs.

In the late 1960s, a similar campaign was waged to increase inclusion and diversity at Princeton. Activists sought to convince the administration to abandon its in loco parentis role, democratize student government, admit women, and oppose the war in Vietnam. But the difference back then was that, despite many disagreements on these issues, students never lost sight of the fact that we were all Princetonians. My class was a “well-rounded” melting pot, made up of Northerners and Southerners, liberals and conservatives, rich and middle class, graduates of Exeter and the Bronx High School of Science, blacks and whites, Christians and Jews. But none of these labels really defined who we were or how we thought about anyone else, or prevented us from sharing life and learning at this University during that tumultuous and divisive era.

Sometimes contrasting the present unfavorably with the past can be dismissed as nostalgia for the “good old days,” but the “assimilationist” approach of the ’60s has more to offer than simply turning back the clock.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics