Amid concerns about the future of undocumented students on campus, President Eisgruber ’83 said the University will support them “to the maximum extent that the law allows.” At the same time, he rejected the idea of declaring Princeton a “sanctuary campus,” saying the proposal has no legal basis.
Concern has been growing on campuses across the country about students covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which has provided work permits to shield immigrants from deportation since 2012.
In a Nov. 28 statement to the Princeton community, Eisgruber noted that President-elect Donald Trump has said he might end DACA and deport students who had been protected by it. “That would be a tragic mistake,” said Eisgruber, who joined a group of college presidents a week earlier in a statement supporting DACA.
Addressing a call by students to declare Princeton a sanctuary campus, he said the University believes that colleges “have no authority to exempt any part of their campuses from the nation’s immigration laws,” based on advice from immigration lawyers and on the importance of the rule of law.
“Princeton University will invoke that principle in courts and elsewhere to protect the rights of its community and the individuals within it,” he said. “But we jeopardize our ability to make those arguments effectively, and may even put our DACA students at greater risk, if we suggest that our campus is beyond the law’s reach.”
If DACA is suspended or repealed, Eisgruber said, Princeton will protect its undocumented students “to the maximum extent that the law allows.” Private information about students, faculty, or staff will not be disclosed to law-enforcement authorities without a subpoena or similar requirement, he said, and guidance and support is being offered to members of the community on immigration matters.
Eisgruber noted that both his parents were immigrants and that he has “devoted much of my adult life to writing and teaching about the rights of religious minorities.” He said he was deeply troubled by hostility toward immigrants and toward Muslims and other religious minorities during the campaign, but said he was “heartened by our community’s vigorous affirmation of the commitment to inclusivity.”
His full statement follows:
Over the past two weeks, many people on campus and beyond have expressed concerns about the future of Princetonians covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which permits undocumented students to continue their studies here without fear of deportation. I appreciate these concerns and share them. While we cannot know at this point what will happen in the coming months, the president-elect said during his campaign that he might end DACA and deport students who had been protected by it.
That would be a tragic mistake. DACA is a wise, humane, and beneficial policy. It enables law-abiding young people who have grown up in the United States to develop their talents and contribute productively to this country, which is their home. Princeton University has consistently supported DACA, and I both hope and believe that the policy can be sustained. Though I usually do not sign petitions or mass letters, I joined a group of more than 100 college and university presidents who last week issued a statement supporting DACA. That statement now has 300 signatories.
I have received a number of letters and petitions urging Princeton to do all it can to support its undocumented students if DACA is suspended or repealed. We will do so to the maximum extent that the law allows. Our efforts will be aided by policies already in place to protect the privacy and safety of every member of the University community. For example, we do not disclose private information about our students, faculty, or staff to law enforcement officers unless we are presented with a subpoena or comparably binding requirement. We are actively reviewing this policy and other policies and practices to ensure that they fully protect all of our students, faculty, and staff, including our DACA students. We will also ensure that affected members of our community know where they can turn for guidance and support on matters related to immigration, including to the very knowledgeable staff of the Davis International Center.
Some of the correspondence reaching me has asked Princeton to declare itself a “sanctuary campus.” Immigration lawyers with whom we have consulted have told us that this concept has no basis in law, and that colleges and universities have no authority to exempt any part of their campuses from the nation’s immigration laws.
As a constitutional scholar myself, I agree with that judgment and believe that it connects to one of the country’s most basic principles: its commitment to the rule of law. That principle deserves special attention in this uncertain and contentious time. In a country that respects the rule of law, every person and every official, no matter what office he or she may hold, is subject to the law and must respect the rights of others. Princeton University will invoke that principle in courts and elsewhere to protect the rights of its community and the individuals within it. But we jeopardize our ability to make those arguments effectively, and may even put our DACA students at greater risk, if we suggest that our campus is beyond the law’s reach.
I hope you will permit me to close on a more personal note. Both of my parents immigrated to this country, and I have devoted much of my adult life to writing and teaching about the rights of religious minorities. I am deeply troubled by the hostility that was expressed toward immigrants and toward Muslims and other religious minorities during the recent election campaign. But I am heartened by our community’s vigorous affirmation of the commitment to inclusivity that is fundamental not only to our University but also to America’s constitutional values. I am glad to stand with other members of our community on behalf of DACA and the rights and well-being of all our students, faculty, and staff.