Princeton Adds To Its Endowment in 2020, But Uncertainty Remains

Nassau Hall

Princeton University, OVP for Communications and PA, Daniel A. Day (2020)

carlett spike
By Carlett Spike

Published Nov. 20, 2020

2 min read

The University endowment had a 5.6 percent return in the fiscal year 2020 that ended June 30 — down from the average result in recent years, but shielding Princeton from the damage and cuts COVID-19 inflicted on many universities. 

The endowment increased to $26.2 billion. In the previous year, Princeton’s endowment returned 6.2 percent. The average annual return over the past decade has been 10.6 percent.

Facing the financial uncertainties created by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge, said Andrew Golden, president of the Princeton University Investment Co. (Princo). It was the first time investors have “experienced a moment of financial stress that was caused by something outside of the financial system,” Golden said in an interview with PAW, “which makes it particularly challenging because the underlying issue, this pandemic, is pretty hard to predict.” 

As a result, the University saw both positive and negative returns within its portfolio of investments, Golden said. In global developed markets, Princo investments finished the year with a 25 percent gain. He added that the University outperformed in emerging markets, but some areas, such as real estate, experienced uncertainty. Additionally, the University’s “independent returns,” such as hedge funds, broke even.

According to University spokesman Michael Hotchkiss, the endowment paid for 61 percent of the University’s operating-budget expenses in the 2019–20 academic year. The University’s spending rate — the percentage of the endowment drawn on in a given year — increased to 5.53 percent in 2019–20, Hotchkiss said. 

The endowment paid for 61 percent of the University’s operating-budget expenses in 2019–20.

“Princeton has been fortunate to face the many financial challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic from a strong budgetary position, thanks in part to an endowment that is the result of generations of generosity from alumni and friends, as well as effective stewardship and investment by the trustees and Princo,” Provost Deborah Prentice said in a University statement.

Princeton’s results landed in the middle among Ivy League institutions. Brown University’s endowment performed the best with a return of 12.1 percent. 

The unpredictability of COVID will not prompt Princo to change its fundamental strategy. “Our success has always been driven by our focus on the long term ... so I think it would be a mistake to oversteer right now,” Golden said. Achieving reasonable returns in this climate “supports the fairly robust and resilient strategy,” Golden said. 

Fiscal year 2021, which includes the fall semester, has seen reductions in revenue from tuition, room, and board due to the pandemic, Hotchkiss told PAW. The budget provides financial aid for 61 percent of Princeton’s undergraduate students. 

 Eight months into the pandemic, Golden said, there will likely be more stressors and challenging times ahead. So far, Golden said, the University’s investments are experiencing a stronger start in the 2021 fiscal year. “We’re seeing some good things emerge out of our venture-capital portfolio,” he said. “So that’s gratifying.” 

Endowment returns sources: Brown.edu; Dartmouth News; Harvard Magazine; Yale News; Office of Communications; Pensions & Investments; Penn Office of Investments; Cornell Chronicle


Endowment Returns for the Ivies

Brown 12.1%
Dartmouth 7.6%
Harvard 7.3%
Yale 6.8%
Princeton 5.6%
Columbia 5.5%
Penn 3.4%
Cornell 1.9%

1 Response

George White ’57

3 Years Ago

Endowment Performance

Reporting on the performance of the Princeton endowment (On the Campus, December issue), we are told that “Princeton’s results landed in the middle among Ivy League institutions.”  Like that’s an OK situation?  A more accurate description might be that “Princeton was the best of the worst — 5th out of 8.”  The average Ivy return was 6.25 percent, but Princeton’s was just 5.6 percent.  The top four (Brown, Dartmouth, Harvard, and Yale) averaged 8.45 percent.   

Let’s see … had Princeton earned only the Ivy average, the additional income would have amounted to some $170 million. That’s serious money. And if Princeton had earned the top four’s 8.45 percent average that would have resulted in an additional $480 million. Now we’re talking really serious money.

So, the return was “positive” only in the sense that money wasn’t lost. Depending on the grading system used, actual performance was, if pass/fail, definitely a fail; or if the now standard A through F system, maybe a D. In 1957 at Princeton, it would have been a 5, or perhaps a very generous 4-minus. 

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics