With Reunions expected to be held on campus for the first time since 2019, planning for the May 19-22 event has been especially challenging. Princeton staff were preparing for a crowd ranging from 22,000 to more than 30,000 people.
“We’ve done quite a bit of scenario planning to make sure that we have — to the degree that we can — created space for all who want to come back and feel this warm embrace from the University,” Alexandra Day ’02, deputy vice president for alumni engagement, said in mid-March.
A task force including Environmental Health and Safety, Grounds and Building Maintenance, and Public Safety was planning for housing, transportation, wristbands, tents, and other “budgetary and logistical pressure points,” said Day, in case the higher estimates panned out.
Two-fifths of the alumni body missed a major reunion during the pandemic, and many alumni have expressed a desire to celebrate belatedly. While the University announced that it would not “triple up” on Reunions this year, the sites for the 25th and 50th reunions have been expanded.
In March, the University updated its visitor policy to allow for optional masking on campus, though that policy could change again before Reunions. All attendees must register ahead of time and attest that they are up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations to obtain a wristband. Registration is not necessary for outdoor events where wristbands are not required. For more information, go to reunions.princeton.edu.
The Latest
See all
Related News
Remembering Landon Y. Jones ’66, Editor, Author, and Inveterate ‘Ripper’
Friends paid tribute Nov. 15 at a memorial service in the Princeton University Chapel
Princeton to Cut Way Down on Alums’ Free Google Email Storage
A squeeze from Google is prompting Princeton to slice the generous free email storage it offered alumni in the past
Meet Kathy Crow ’89: Philanthropist and Lightning Rod
The former lacrosse standout’s friendship with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas stirred a national controversy
1 Response
The Rev. Fred Morton ’62
2 Years AgoA Response to Our Crisis in Democracy
Every year in late May some 20,000-plus graduates old and new assemble on the bucolic campus of Princeton to renew old acquaintances, meet new grads, and remember why Princeton was so significant in shaping their lives. Part of that rich experience involves lively discussions of major issues of our times featuring both alumni and University faculty.
One such seminar was held Friday, May 20. In one of the largest lecture halls, McCosh 50, over a hundred of us heard a panel discuss the future of democracy in America. The discussion was chaired by distinguished history professor Julian E. Zelizer and included knowledgeable public servants, attorneys, activists, and journalists.
The animated discussion drew a breathtaking conclusion — to wit, the current situation is a crisis of major proportions going beyond the analysis so current today: the insoluble impasse between our two parties and major fractures in our democratic election systems.
Its seriousness, panelists contended, matched the political crisis of the 1850s. The panel was filled with exhaustive analysis. But the best solution they could suggest was make voting mandatory and reintroduce the study of civics in public school curriculum.
I was profoundly disappointed and wondered what my major professors back in the day, such as Eric Goldman (American history) and David Donald (19th century American history, scholar on the Civil War) would have said. What they taught me still inspires my civic and religious stewardship in the very present.
At the seminar I tried in vain to lift up to this troubled assembly my own personal answer. I believe the message from these keen observers in ages past lies not in singular votes or the makeup of political parties.
What can save our nation are movements which mobilize political action over the long haul. That was surely the case with abolition, labor unions, temperance, women’s suffrage and more recently civil rights as well as sexual equality.
As for me, an 82-year-old retired Methodist Clergy, I have joined the Poor People’s Campaign to address the crisis our nation faces and to truly build “a more perfect union.” I have diverted half of my church tithe to such movements and considerable volunteer time. I have even been arrested on two occasions working in this campaign.
This movement is the outgrowth of Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream that we can combat the four fold problems of endemic poverty, white racism, a war economy, and ecological devastation.
This is a nationwide movement with vibrant organization in nearly every state —even Mississippi, Alabama, and Tennessee. It reaches to local as well as national dimensions.
They are supporting our local efforts in Memphis to resist an underground pipeline through poor neighborhoods. Go to the website to check out our extensive white papers on all these issues. You can join a local group or support financially.
These are moral movements which span election cycles and have compelling narratives and ethical as well as spiritual claims — the stuff that changes and makes history. To me, more than any other strategy it addresses the keenest and most decisive issues of our times and most serious threat to our democracy in over 170 years.
Friendly wags on the periphery of faith communities remind us that prophet and saints are remembered while their holy messages most often ignored. That has been the case with Dr. King. But if he is indeed the moral prophet for our times, the Poor People’s Campaign is a movement response to the deeply worrying questions raised in McCosh 50 during our reunion.
Editor’s note: Fred Morton is retired Elder in United Methodist Church and native of Memphis, Tenn. He holds a A.B. degree in history from Princeton, a B.D. degree from Duke University, and an M.S. in psychology from Murray State (Ky.) University. He has served churches in Memphis as well as served as Campus Minister at Murray State. Currently he is involved with MICAH Memphis (Memphis Interfaith Coalition for Action and Hope), where he serves as co-chair of the sub task group on courts and procedures