Princeton’s Historic NCAA Run Ends With Loss in Sweet 16

“It’s such a year of joy for our program,” head coach Mitch Henderson ’98 says after Tigers lose 86-75 to Creighton

Creighton's Trey Alexander and Princeton's Ryan Langborg ’23 vie for a loose ball in the second half of Friday's Sweet 16 game.

Creighton’s Trey Alexander and Princeton’s Ryan Langborg ’23 vie for a loose ball in the second half of Friday’s Sweet 16 game.

AP Photo/John Bazemore

Brett Tomlinson
By Brett Tomlinson

Published March 24, 2023

6 min read

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Seniors Tosan Evbuomwan and Ryan Langborg did everything they could to help Princeton match Creighton Friday night, but the Bluejays’ combination of hot 3-point shooting and strength in the paint powered them to an 86-75 victory, ending the Tigers’ historic NCAA Tournament run.  

Evbuomwan scored 24 points, assisted on nine baskets, grabbed six rebounds, and orchestrated Princeton’s final push, in which the Tigers cut the lead to seven points with 3:38 remaining. Langborg finished with 26 points, a career high.  

Just 12 days passed between the afternoon that Princeton walked off Carril Court with the Ivy League’s NCAA Tournament bid in hand and the night its season ended in Louisville. In that span, the Tigers knocked off two major-conference powers, Arizona and Missouri, challenged a third, and ignited a legion of fans.    

“It’s such a year of joy for our program,” head coach Mitch Henderson ’98. “These guys have done something that no one has ever done. And I know there’s some really great Princeton teams in the past, but this is a really, really special team. It’s such an honor to be around them on a day-to-day basis.” 

On a night when the tournament’s two remaining No. 1 seeds fell short of the Elite Eight, an Ivy League school made a statement for mid-major programs playing in the Sweet 16. “I think it just shows that there’s not a lot that separates us from everyone else,” Langborg said. “If you have a tough group that’s bonded and best of friends, and you play with joy, anything can happen.” 

Read more PAW coverage of the 2023 NCAA Tournament

Princeton played Creighton close in the first half and trailed by four points at the break. A cold start by the Tigers after halftime helped the Bluejays quickly extend their lead to 11 points. When Creighton’s Baylor Scheierman banked in a 3-pointer with 13:15 left, the margin ballooned to 14. A minute later, a layup by Trey Alexander made it 16, the largest lead Creighton would hold. 

Princeton clawed its way back, largely relying on Evbuomwan and Langborg, and the Tigers’ zone defense helped neutralize Creighton in stretches. But Ryan Kalkbrenner, the Bluejays’ 7-foot-1 center, made the most of the limited space he was given, scoring 22 points to lead Creighton. Three other Bluejays scored in double figures, and true to their tournament form, they made free throws down the stretch when Princeton was forced to foul.  

The Tiger fans, who filled one section of the arena’s lower bowl and a vast network of orange patches throughout, arrived in full voice. From the first “Let’s Go Tigers” chant before tipoff to the explosive cheers after Evbuomwan’s opening basket, one could almost believe it was a Princeton home game.  

“You feel the love from all the alums and all the people that came here to support us,” Langborg said. “They were traveling thousands of miles to come see us play. It was so much fun to play in front of a crowd like that.” 

But the Creighton contingent’s “C-U” replies restored the neutral site atmosphere — and the Bluejays gave them plenty to cheer about, making 10 of their first 13 shots, including 4-of-6 shooting on 3-pointers.   

The Tigers double-teamed Kalkbrenner when he received the ball in the post, opening space for 3-point shooters. Then the Bluejays started working the ball from the outside in, cashing in with dunks by Kalkbrenner and Fredrick King. Creighton led by eight, 24-16, with 11:12 left in the first half.  

The momentum began to shift in a Princeton run that included a Caden Pierce ’26 dunk, assisted by Evbuomwan, and a rare Evbuomwan 3-pointer. By the next media timeout at 7:42, the Tigers trailed by two, 29-27, and Langborg soon evened the score with a layup. After a seesaw stretch, Langborg and Blake Peters ’25 each found bottom of the net with 3-pointers, and Princeton led, 37-33. Creighton called timeout.   

Creighton would quickly rebound, tying the game on a 3-pointer by Scheierman. A Princeton turnover on the next possession led to a fast break, and a goaltending call against Langborg gave the Bluejays a basket and the lead, 40-38. 

Kalkbrenner had his best stretch of the game in the last 1:26 of the first half, scoring seven points, including three free throws. But Evbuomwan lifted his team as well, making a contested layup and assisting on a 3-pointer by Peters. Princeton trailed the Bluejays 47-43 at the break. 

Princeton finished the year with a 23-9 record, Ivy League regular-season and tournament championships, and the program’s first appearance in the Sweet 16 since the NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985.  

“We were a work in progress all season,” Henderson said. “We really got to play our best basketball here as of late.” 

Indeed, the Tigers began the season with two losses, to Hofstra and Navy, before rattling off eight straight wins. They experienced the pain of losing a game they led by 19 (at home vs. Yale) and two weeks later felt the thrill of winning a game they trailed by 19 (at home vs. Penn). 

Princeton’s NCAA Tournament history has a certain mythology, from the stardust of Bill Bradley ’65’s Final Four team to the near-upset against No. 1 seed Georgetown in 1989 and Pete Carril’s farewell win over UCLA in 1996. This run had glimpses of that type of magic, but the overall feel was one of brilliant competence, even when shots weren’t falling. No challenge seemed to faze the Tigers, and Evbuomwan, in his point-guard-as-center role, set the tone. 

“It’s exquisite watching him play, to me,” Henderson said a day before the Creighton game. “He is like a 9 [center forward] or a 10 [attacking midfielder] in soccer. He slows the game down for himself, which then speeds the game up for those around him.” 

The Tigers’ star said Henderson’s emphasis on constant improvement served him well. “He’s pushed me all four years,” Evbuomwan said. “It’s all you want as a player, I think, and someone like me who just wants to get better, you know, he’s never taken me lightly. … He’s always insisting I can be better and [that] just inspires confidence in me and even greater willingness to work.” 

All of Princeton’s seniors have a remaining year of NCAA eligibility because they missed a season of competition when the Ivy League canceled athletics in 2020-21 due to the pandemic. Evbuomwan and Langborg both could be prized graduate transfers, especially after their performances in March. Evbuomwan also looks like a potential pro. He said he’ll speak with his family and loved ones in the coming weeks before making a decision.  

“I’m not sure I’m going to find another group like this,” he said. “We just look out for one another all the time. I’ve never really had this — there’s no ego at all amongst us. We don’t care at all who’s getting the attention, who’s scoring points, who’s doing this, who’s doing that. We just really root for one another and want to see each other be successful.” 

Langborg said he anticipates more postseason runs ahead for Princeton. “I hope that the senior class has been able to leave an imprint on the younger guys, to keep working no matter what,” he said. “I mean, it took us four years to get to this point, right? So just keep playing with joy, keep playing with happiness, grind together. There’s going to be a lot of blood and tears along the way, but it’s a fun road.” 

2 Responses

Jane Fleming Fransson ’00

1 Year Ago

An open letter to the president:

Dear President Eisgruber,

I have been a member of the Princeton community for my entire life. I went to Reunions as a kid, with my grandfather (’34), uncle (’62), and father (’69). My sister (’01) and I (’00) enjoyed a three-year overlap as undergrads together, a period I believe my ever-loyal Tiger father enjoyed immensely. Now, as a local Princetonian (I live less than a mile from Nassau Hall), who is married to a Princetonian (*05), bringing up two boys in this wonderful town, I couldn’t feel more connected to the University. I’ve volunteered in various capacities over the years, interviewing potential incoming Princeton students and serving as a member of CPUC, among other roles. I’m also looking forward to attending the mini-reunion/pre-planning session for the Class of ’00’s 25th reunion in April. And, as usual, figuring out who will sleep where for the upcoming June reunions.

I say all this to make clear that I love my old university and have felt connected to the University and my fellow alums in a profound way my entire life, even before I matriculated there, and well before I moved to this town. And I have never, in my entire life, seen or felt such an astonishing outpouring of Princeton love as I witnessed this past month. I was lucky enough to snag a ticket to the Sweet 16 game in Louisville the weekend before last, and it was a sight I will never forget. Princeton people wandering around a distant town, wearing their Reunions jackets, high-fiving other tiger-striped strangers, overflowing with joy and warmth and community. We see that every June on our beautiful campus, but I have never witnessed it anywhere else than in Princeton. I don’t think any of us have. The amount of goodwill the basketball team engendered with its magical post-season run cannot possibly be calculated.

I have never been a big believer that college coaches and athletes should be bigger than the university they represent. A lot of the schools we competed against in that tournament do believe that. But that’s not the Ivy League. That’s not Princeton. And I think that is why I found Princeton’s entire NCAA March Madness run so utterly remarkable. Coach Henderson and his players represented themselves as Princetonians and students first, throughout their entire time in the spotlight. Every time the coach was interviewed — and it was a lot — all he spoke about was how proud of his students he was. He didn’t go on and on about how amazing their athletic prowess was; he bragged about their interest in neuroscience. He didn’t blow up his own coaching prowess; he brought his Mandarin-speaking shooting guard on to talk about his secretary of state aspirations. He made a point in every single interview to say that Princeton was the greatest school in the country — not just the best basketball program, but the best school and the best place he could ever hope to work.

I flew home the morning after that amazing Creighton game — a loss, but an incredible one — with a glow that could not be dampened by a scoreboard. For all our University spirit, and I have seen much of it over four-plus decades, this felt like something entirely different. Our greatest spirited gatherings, our annual reunions, exist only within our orange bubble. This was a show we took on the road. The world got to see our pride, our community, our sportsmanship, our support of our students, our connection as alums — we were on display, all the best parts of Princeton, for the world to see. What a gift, I kept saying. What a gift.

As I got to know the team’s roster better over the course of the season this year, I was struck by how closely it resembled the perfect community the University has been working so hard to build on campus. Coach Henderson has put together a team of strivers and workers, zero celebrities or superstars. Just a team of incredibly talented student-athletes who continue to put their team first. They are diverse from every angle — race, class, economic background, academic interest, religion, nationality, and so on. And always, always, the team is bigger than any one individual. What a great metaphor for the University as a whole, let alone a perfect demonstration of the University’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion we’ve been working so hard to prioritize in recent years.

I’m sure Coach Henderson’s phone is ringing off the hook after this run — not just because of his wins on the court, but the utter class with which he presented his players and his program off the court. Well-deserved. For all the Fields medalists, Nobel laureates, and MacArthur geniuses roaming our hallways, I would be hard-pressed to think of a single one, who, in the moment of their greatest personal triumph, continually put their University, let alone their students, far ahead of their own private achievements.

How on Earth are we going to be able to keep our coach at our school, the one who has led this team to so many amazing seasons and so many phenomenal accomplishments, all the while keeping the spotlight on the brilliance of his players in the classrooms, not their prowess on the court? After the last month of being the greatest ambassador for this university’s values we could ever ask for — putting on global display our commitment to diversity, equity, community, unity, pride and spirit — I certainly hope the University does everything it can to retain him here.

Losing him wouldn’t just be a blow to our basketball program and all the alums who came together all over the world to cheer them on these last few weeks — it would be a loss to all future members of our community. It would rob all of them, and all of us, from finding this magical moment of joy and connection with our fellow alums and our beloved university in the future. What a painful loss that would be.

Let’s Go Tigers,

Roderick McNealy ’72

1 Year Ago

Both programs did a wonderful job this year and galvanized Princeton alums. Both should be tremendously proud of what they have achieved during a very difficult period. While the final outcome not what we wanted, game performance did not disappoint. (Las Vegas had Creighton as a 10-point favorite. That’s why they have all those enormous hotels — they’re usually right.)

Thank you to both the women’s and men’s teams for a great season and tremendous fun along the way.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News