David Nirenberg *92 Is Leading the Institute for Advanced Study

Nirenberg wants to get people who might not be natural collaborators thinking and working together

Placeholder author icon
By Katharine Gammon ’03

Published Oct. 19, 2022

3 min read

This is a photo of David Nirenberg sitting on the steps of a building with Gothic arches in the background.

David Nirenberg *92

John Zich

David Nirenberg *92 sees connections everywhere. As a professor of medieval history, he charted the relatedness of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic thought in different eras. As a dean at the University of Chicago Divinity School, he championed a program to promote collaborative ideas across the university. 

As the new director of the Institute for Advanced Study, he said he plans to harness its deep resources to get people who might not be natural collaborators thinking and working together. His background in the humanities stands out from past directors, who overwhelmingly have been scientists and mathematicians.

Nirenberg, who became director in February, says he hopes to encourage more overlap between different areas of the collective brain trust that the institute has. For example, he points to algorithms — computational approaches for just about everything that determines how we live. “Can we bring together our mathematical computer scientists with our social scientists and humanists to think about the impact on society of algorithms?” he asks. Doing so could help detect bias in algorithms and make them more fair and robust for the future. 

Integrating the views of behavioral scientists and humanists early on in science and technological questions can also avoid problems that naturally arise, he says. “By the time you get to the technical intervention to solve a health problem or a climate issue, you have passed a lot of behavioral answers along the way.” 

Read about more Tigers of the Week

Nirenberg grew up in a Spanish-speaking household in upstate New York, which he says inspired a lifelong attraction to conversations across languages, religions, and cultures. “I have always been interested in what each part of our culture brings to thinking about a problem and how all these parts relate to each other,” he says. His academic work also follows similar outlines: He studied the ways that Islam, Judaism, and Christianity shaped thought in the other religions. He also penned a book — cowritten with his mathematician father — that explores the sameness in different forms of knowledge, from poetry and dreams, to monotheism, math, and physics. 

The Institute for Advanced Study was founded in 1930 in Princeton as a home for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry, and has four schools: Historical Studies, Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences. Scholars there have made discoveries that have transformed their academic fields, from mathematics and physics to anthropology and art history. With no classes to teach and no research grants to chase, faculty can spend their time working on their own goals. It has been a space of scholarly freedom for many prominent scholars — including Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Freeman Dyson, and John von Neumann. 

Bringing all those powers together in a coherent way can make a difference in the future, Nirenberg says. “The specialization of generating knowledge is clear, but it’s also clear that’s not enough,” he says. “We have to find ways to bring the powers of different specialists on problems, and we have to translate into ways our fellow humans can understand.” 

In order for society to achieve anything major, he says, it takes transformation at the level of the stories people tell each other and the knowledge we achieve — the values we hold together. And those aren’t achievable by any one discipline. “Without things like the novel, philosophy of rights, or humanities, democracy was inconceivable,” he says. And that’s true for problems we face today: If people want to change their behavior and society to battle the climate crisis, they need to approach the problem from a social, narrative, and ethical point of view. 

Nirenberg was a visiting scholar at the institute in 1996, and remembers the connections being forged across boundaries — which he hopes to foster as director. “What brought me was the beauty of the conversation between an immense collective world brain in one place,” he says. “Every year several hundred of the most interesting people on the planet come together, and who wouldn’t want to be part of that?” 

2 Responses

James Bockel

1 Year Ago

In his great article in the weekend edition of The Wall Street Journal (“History Can Be an Antidote to Antisemitism”), Professor Nirenberg mentions several murderous antisemites who quote the Bible and Jesus as their basis for their evil acts. It is very common for nonbelievers to use individual Bible verses to support a variety of points of view ranging from politics to money, sexual preferences, antisemitism, etc. One verse Nirenberg mentions is Jesus speaking to the Pharisees, John 8:44 (...You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires...), which is a verse that Robert Bowers used on social media to explain his murder of 11 Jews at The Tree of Life Synagogue in 2018. The rich context for that verse is all about Jesus confronting the Pharisees about their corruption of God’s word with politics and power over the common Jewish population. Jesus was not referring at all to Jews or the Jewish faith. The Bible is full of warnings about false teachers of the faith. This was a perfect example of God himself calling out how evil and devilish this practice was and remains. Context is important.

David Hough *77

1 Year Ago

I’d like to suggest two topics for the Institute: cheap, excellent U.S. health care and the machine learning revolution.

Recently I’ve been reading Alan Blinder’s books, spurred by his new book on monetary history, and his comments on how expensive health care reform is have again raised a lot of questions for me. The wonderful NAS study of 2013 on “Shorter Lives, Poorer Health” shows that all the other advanced countries have much better health systems than the U.S. at much lower cost, 9 percent of GDP rather than 18 percent. Why can’t the U.S. save a lot of money by adopting any of these other systems? I’ve been living in Japan and Korea for the last five years, and I got several free (for residents, not even citizenship required) annual checkups and a hip replacement operation. The health care is so good!

On AI, I was delighted recently to read a story on Ars Technica about matrix algorithms that use fewer expensive algorithms, starting from the 2x2 case of using 7, not 8 (so 4x4 uses 49, not 64). Machine learning really started to make an impact in 2013 at ImageNet (see the AlexNet paper), and then AlphaGo and AlphaFold took off. A Japanese friend suggested we were at another cusp point like the Industrial Revolution, unbelievable at first but maybe so. Machine learning creates knowledge without human effort, so my image is the graph of nonhuman energy use, starting from about 0.5 MTOE (back forever) to 14,000 in 2010. I’d like to see a better transition this time than the 60 years from 1800 where the factory workers got zero wage increase.

Join the conversation

Plain text

Full name and Princeton affiliation (if applicable) are required for all published comments. For more information, view our commenting policy. Responses are limited to 500 words for online and 250 words for print consideration.

Related News

Newsletters.
Get More From PAW In Your Inbox.

Learn More

Title complimentary graphics