Context, Impact Explored: Scholars Take a Deeper Look at Woodrow Wilson’s Legacy on Race
Often left out of the discussion of Woodrow Wilson 1879’s policies on race as president of the United States is the fact that there were many more people urging Wilson to keep the country segregated than to stop segregation, said Wilson biographer A. Scott Berg ’71, one of four scholars who spoke on an April 9 panel about Wilson’s legacy. Additionally, before he took office, many Southern congressmen told Wilson he would not get any bills passed if he allowed the integration of government offices to continue, Berg said.
“I don’t think he was a hater,” said Berg, who went on to say, “Yes, he was a racist.” Berg, a University trustee and a member of the Wilson Legacy Review Committee, said that “during his presidency, Wilson kept the race conversation going. ... I think Wilson knew when he got into office that race was going to have to be dealt with, and I think he wanted more than anything else for it not to be on his watch.”
Other scholars on the panel, sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson School, included Chad Williams *04, associate professor and chair of the Department of African and Afro-American Studies at Brandeis University; Eric Yellin *07, an associate professor of history and American studies at the University of Richmond; and Ashleigh Lawrence-Sanders, a Ph.D. candidate in the history department at Rutgers University. The event took place four days after the announcement that the trustees had decided to retain Wilson’s name on Princeton’s public-affairs school and on one of its residential colleges.
Yellin, who will teach a course at Princeton in the fall called “Woodrow Wilson’s America,” said that when Wilson campaigned as a progressive candidate, he said he had “the best of hopes for everyone — including African Americans.” After he assumed office, Yellin said, Wilson justified the segregationist actions of his administration by promoting the idea that segregation was in the best interest of all Americans because friction between the races could cause issues in
the workplace.
“That’s a progressive, bureaucratic justification that we see again and again,” Yellin said. The result, he said, was “an erasure of 30 years of African Americans serving the nation at all levels of the federal government.”
The Latest
See all
Related News
Remembering Landon Y. Jones ’66, Editor, Author, and Inveterate ‘Ripper’
Friends paid tribute Nov. 15 at a memorial service in the Princeton University Chapel
Princeton to Cut Way Down on Alums’ Free Google Email Storage
A squeeze from Google is prompting Princeton to slice the generous free email storage it offered alumni in the past
Meet Kathy Crow ’89: Philanthropist and Lightning Rod
The former lacrosse standout’s friendship with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas stirred a national controversy
1 Response
Jon B. Wang ’62
4 Years AgoThe Tail Wagging the Dog
The tail is now wagging the dog.
The tail is the cluster of naive undergraduates influenced by a revolutionary insurgency — an overtly socialist movement that has deceptively named itself “Black Lives Matter.”
The dog is the Princeton faculty and staff who have lost their compass and shamelessly trail along behind a BLM caravan.
It is apparent that Princeton University is no longer guided by the time-honored wisdom so eloquently described by H.E. Mierow, Class of 1914: “Here we were taught, by men and gothic towers, democracy and faith and righteousness and love of unseen things that do not die.”
I am half Chinese and half Caucasian. From age 5 to 12, I lived in a country where citizens of diverse ancestry — African, East Indian, Chinese, Portuguese, English, indigenous Amerindian — all lived, went to school and worked together.
In that time and place there was no racial discrimination. It was, as Martin Luther King Jr. has stated, character, not skin color, that was important and was respected.
Racism is to be abhorred. Responsible initiatives are needed and must be implemented.
Self-abuse is not a solution.